0
What is the difference between the Ptolemy and Copernicus models of the solar system?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
The difference between Ptolemy's and Copernicus's model was that, Ptolemy's model had the Earth in the middle of the Solar System, with all the other planets (including the Sun and the moons) revolving around it. In Copernicus's model, he had the Sun in the center of the Solar System.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWiki User
∙ 12y agoPtolemy thought the earth was the center of the solar system (Otherwise known as the Geocentric theory) and Copernicus's idea was that the sun was at the center of the solar system (Heliocentric theroy).
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago1. Ptolemy (and Aristotle) developed a geocentric (or Earth centered) view of the solar system based upon his idealistic view of its perception; i.e. known as Geocentrism (or the Ptolemaic system). Similarly while everything we know about the universe is based on our ability to observe and measure varying degrees of luminosity/radiation within this fourth dimensional confinement, there is no credible model of the universe which endorses a geocentric model for our known universe.===2. Copernicus established and supported the logic for a more sun centered view of the solar systems; i.e. known as Heliocentrism (or the Copernican system).
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoit isnt
Anonymous
The Earth was presented in the middle of his model and in the modern model the sun is in the middle
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What were the similarities between Ptolemy's model and Copernicus' model?
Both Copernicus heliocentric and the Ptolemaic models agreed on the need for epicycles. These were miniature orbits that the celestial bodies travelled on as well as their normal orbits.Copernicus still invigaed the bodies orbiting in perfect circles and had to put these in to explain some of the movements of the planets. This may have contributed to his ideas being largely dismissed as it was just as complicated as the already established model. It was not until Kepler proposed elliptical orbits was this problem resolved.
How was Copernicus' model of the universe different from Ptolemy's model?
The main difference was that Ptolemy's model was geocentric (Earth-centred) and Copernicus's was heliocentric (Sun-centred). Ptolemy's model came from ancient times while Copernicus's was much later (1543). Both models represented the planets' orbits by using combinations of circles and epicycles to explain the way the planets move among the stars. Copernicus found that the orbits of the inner planets could be explained more simply. That is to say that the epicycles used for all the orbits were smaller, and for the inner planets a lot smaller. Both models represented the planets' positions with reasonable accuracy given the crude observational methods used in those days. Until gravity and the laws of dynamics were discovered about 150 years after the publication of Copernicus's system, there was no way of deciding which model was the 'right' one.
What was the the model solar system that was thought to be correct before Copernicus?
It was Ptolemy's model. Ptolemy's model came from ancient times while Copernicus's was much later (1543).Both models represented the planets' orbits by using combinations of circles and epicycles to explain the way the planets move among the stars.Copernicus found that the orbits of the inner planets could be explained more simply. That is to say that the epicycles used for all the orbits were smaller, and for the inner planets a lot smaller.Both models represented the planets' positions with reasonable accuracy given the crude observational methods used in those days.Until gravity and the laws of dynamics were discovered about 150 years after the publication of Copernicus's system, there was no way of deciding which model was the 'right' one.
What is the similarity between the Ptolemy and Copernicus models of the solar system?
The similarity is that both theories used a system of circles and epicycles to explain how the planets move around. Copernicus's theory (1543) used a similar number of epicycles, but many of them were smaller so that the paths followed by the planets were geometrically simpler. The difference was that Copernicus placed the Sun at the centre rather than the Earth as the ancient theory had done. Another theory was later produced by Kepler (1609), which used Copernicus's idea of having the Sun at the centre, but Kepler used elliptical orbits for the planets. This new model fitted observational measurements better, but it was not until many years later after the discovery of the law of gravity and the laws of motion (1687) that it was possible to pick out Kepler's theory as the correct one that is still in use today.
What is difference between Copernicus and Kepler's description of planetary orbits?
Both models have the Sun in the centre and all the planets going round it, including the Earth. Copernicus (1543) used a system of circles and epicycles similar to the one used by Ptolemy over a thousand years earlier. Both models represented the movements of the planets among the stars with quite good accuracy. Kepler (1609) used the novel idea of elliptical orbits for the planets. Tycho Brahe had made new observations with unprecedented accuracy, and Kepler found that the new elliptical model fitted these observations more accurately than the other models. At the time the new model was published there was no way of deciding which model was right. But, 70-80 years later, Isaac Newton's theoretical discoveries in gravity and dynamics were used to show that the planets must follow elliptical orbits under the force of the Sun's gravity. After that Kepler's model was accepted generally.
What were the similarities between Ptolemy's model and Copernicus' model?
Both Copernicus heliocentric and the Ptolemaic models agreed on the need for epicycles. These were miniature orbits that the celestial bodies travelled on as well as their normal orbits.Copernicus still invigaed the bodies orbiting in perfect circles and had to put these in to explain some of the movements of the planets. This may have contributed to his ideas being largely dismissed as it was just as complicated as the already established model. It was not until Kepler proposed elliptical orbits was this problem resolved.
How was Copernicus' model of the universe different from Ptolemy's model?
The main difference was that Ptolemy's model was geocentric (Earth-centred) and Copernicus's was heliocentric (Sun-centred). Ptolemy's model came from ancient times while Copernicus's was much later (1543). Both models represented the planets' orbits by using combinations of circles and epicycles to explain the way the planets move among the stars. Copernicus found that the orbits of the inner planets could be explained more simply. That is to say that the epicycles used for all the orbits were smaller, and for the inner planets a lot smaller. Both models represented the planets' positions with reasonable accuracy given the crude observational methods used in those days. Until gravity and the laws of dynamics were discovered about 150 years after the publication of Copernicus's system, there was no way of deciding which model was the 'right' one.
What was the the model solar system that was thought to be correct before Copernicus?
It was Ptolemy's model. Ptolemy's model came from ancient times while Copernicus's was much later (1543).Both models represented the planets' orbits by using combinations of circles and epicycles to explain the way the planets move among the stars.Copernicus found that the orbits of the inner planets could be explained more simply. That is to say that the epicycles used for all the orbits were smaller, and for the inner planets a lot smaller.Both models represented the planets' positions with reasonable accuracy given the crude observational methods used in those days.Until gravity and the laws of dynamics were discovered about 150 years after the publication of Copernicus's system, there was no way of deciding which model was the 'right' one.
What difference between medical model and holistic model of care?
difference between holistic and medical models
What is the relationship between models and theories?
The difference between models and theories is nothing hahahahahaha loser go look in your book
What is the similarity between the Ptolemy and Copernicus models of the solar system?
The similarity is that both theories used a system of circles and epicycles to explain how the planets move around. Copernicus's theory (1543) used a similar number of epicycles, but many of them were smaller so that the paths followed by the planets were geometrically simpler. The difference was that Copernicus placed the Sun at the centre rather than the Earth as the ancient theory had done. Another theory was later produced by Kepler (1609), which used Copernicus's idea of having the Sun at the centre, but Kepler used elliptical orbits for the planets. This new model fitted observational measurements better, but it was not until many years later after the discovery of the law of gravity and the laws of motion (1687) that it was possible to pick out Kepler's theory as the correct one that is still in use today.
How does Ptolemy's models model of the universe compare Aristotle's model?
Both Models Show That Celestial Objects Have Circular Paths
What is the difference between Markov Models and Hidden Markov models?
Unlike MM in HMM state is hidden.
Is there any difference between high end models and low end models other than price?
There is a tremendous difference between high end models and low end models aside from price. Higher end products are more reliable and generally have more product specifications.
What is the difference between LG KF755 and KF750 mobile phone models?
Nothing.
What is the difference between different models of curriculum design?
The different between models of curriculum designs are the focus on the content of the curriculum. It is the centered design in most textbooks.
What was the first scientist to dispute Ptolemy's model of a genetic or earth centered?
Copernicus devised an alternative model to explain the planets' movements among the stars. It was similar to Ptolemy's model in that it was composed of circles and epicycles, but it differed in placing the Sun at the centre instead of the Earth. So Ptolemy's model was geocentric while Copernicus's was heliocentric. Copernicus had no way of testing the validity of his model except that it was geometrically simpler, especially for the inner planets Mercury, Venus and Mars which needed much smaller epicycles in Copernicus's model. We now know that the large epicyces in the Ptolemaic model were necessary to compensate for the Earth's movement round the Sun. Galieo's discoveries with the telescope raised more serious doubts about Ptolemy's model when he found that Venus showed phases that could not be explained by the Ptolemaic model. The gibbous phase is not explained by Ptolemy's model because it does not allow Venus to go behind the Sun as seen from Earth. Tycho produced a model that was geocentric but also explained the phases of Venus. Finally all three models were rejected in favour of Kepler's model, which has the Sun at the centre and the planets in elliptical orbits. This is the model used today, with very minor modifications due to the General Theory of Relativity.
