0
Why do you need to ESTIMATE? The exact answer is easy enough to determine! It is 94.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The sum of three consecutive odd integers is -273 what are the integers?
Divide the sum of the three consecutive odd integers by 3: -273 /3 = -91. The smallest of these integers will be two less than -91 and the largest will be two more than -91, so the three consecutive odd integers will be -89, -91, and -93.
What is the sum of the divisors of 36?
Sum of divisors = 91.
If you pair each of the numbers from 1through8 so that the sum of each pair is identical what would the sum be?
it would be a common sum of 91+8 2+7 3+6 4+5
The sum of two consecutive number is 91?
45 + 46 = 91.Suck on it, trebek!
What is a reasonable estimate of the sum of 78 and 119?
A reasonable estimate of the sum of 78 and 119 is 197.
What is the difference between the exact sum of 106 and 91 and an estimate of the sum by rounding to the nearest hundred?
3
What is the sum of 3 plus 88?
3 + 88 = 91
How do you express 91 as a sum of three primes?
3 + 5 + 83
How do you estimate 58 and 3?
It is 61: you do not need to estimate a sum as simple as that!
What is the estimate of one third times 28?
The estimate would be 9.3333 or 91/3
The sum of three consecutive odd integers is -273 what are the integers?
Divide the sum of the three consecutive odd integers by 3: -273 /3 = -91. The smallest of these integers will be two less than -91 and the largest will be two more than -91, so the three consecutive odd integers will be -89, -91, and -93.
What is the sum of the divisors of 36?
Sum of divisors = 91.
Estimate the sum or difference of 3 and 25 - 58?
The answer is -30.
What 3 consecutive odd numbers have a sum of 267?
87,89,91.....87+89+91=267
Is 91 a multiple of 3?
No, 91 is Not a multiple of 3.An easy way to determine if a number is a multiple or divisible by 3 is to add up all itsdigits and see if the sum is divisible by three.For example: 321 , 3 + 2 + 1, Therefore 321 is divisible by 3 or a multiple of 3.Unlike the number 131, 1 + 3 + 1, whose digits sum up to 5, which isn't divisible by 3.So therefore, 91 is 9+1 Therefore 91 is not a multiple of 3.Hope we helped!
What is the largest two digit number that can be written as sum of 2 different cubic numbers?
The two different perfect cubes whose sum is closest to 99 without exceeding 99 are 64 and 27 (4^3 and 3^3). Their sum is 91.
If you pair each of the numbers from 1through8 so that the sum of each pair is identical what would the sum be?
it would be a common sum of 91+8 2+7 3+6 4+5
