Best Answer

Not everyone is agreed on this but Peano's axioms, which are the basis for the axiomatic structure of numbers defines 0 as a natural number and then all other natural numbers in terms of successors.

- 0 is not a successor of any natural number.
- 1 is the successor of 0 is 1 = S(0)
- 2 = S(S(0))
- 3 = S(S(S(0))) and so on.

Q: What is the first number 0 or 1?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

The first counting number is 1. There is some disagreement over the smallest natural number. It is either 0 or 1 so your answer is either 0 or 1.

The answer is 6 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.

Yes. For example: * 0 + 0 = 0 * 1/1 + (-1/1) = 0 * 1/2 + 1/3 is not equal to zero. If the second rational number is the additive inverse of the first, then yes the sum of two rational numbers can be zero. The additive inverse is that number when added to another number gives the result 0, and is denoted as the negative of the first number; the additive inverse of the number a is denoted by -(a) and is such that a + -(a) = 0. eg the additive inverse of 1/2 is -(1/2) giving 1/2 + -(1/2) = 0.

The first number in each pair must be unique.

1

Related questions

L0 0 0 1 equates to: L = load and the first 0 = address. The second 0 = drive, the third 0 = first sector, and the 1 = number.

The first number that can be selected is 00, followed by 0, 1, and so on.

1 or 0 or 2 or 3

The number 0 is the answer to the subtraction 1 - 1 = ? Nothing! The numeral for zero was first used in India in the early centuries CE. Perhaps you are thinking of a 0 in a specific number. Please ask the question again, specifying the number.

Because 0 doesn't have a value, obviously.

The oxidation numbers for the first 20 elements in the periodic table are typically as follows: Group 1 elements: +1; Group 2 elements: +2; Group 13 elements: +3; Group 14 elements: +4 or -4; Group 15 elements: -3; Group 16 elements: -2; Group 17 elements: -1; Group 18 elements: 0. Keep in mind that oxidation numbers can vary in different compounds and contexts.

why is a number to the power of 0 1

1 is a possibility because: I believe that this sequence has two parts. It is an alternating sequence. It has a repeated pattern of 6s as the second number and 4th and 6th and 8th etc. The first number and third and fith, etc. goes down by a number which goes down each time. So it is: 7-3 6+/- 0 4-2 6+/- 0 2-1 6+/- 0 1-0 6+/- 0 1-1 6+/- 0 0 (etc.) But simply the answer could be many things but 1 is the answer I found first.

if you start at zero (0) and count upwards the number one (1) is the first number you get to, it is part of a long chain of numbers that go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on etc...

To get multiple of a number, just multiply the number by 0, by 1, by 2, etc.

n=1

A number can be a square number if its first digit is 0, 1, 4, 5, 6 or 9.