9984 is the largest 4-digit multiple of 32
32 is the smallest two-digit number that can be multiplied by itself to give a four-digit number. (32x32)=1024
32
I'm not sure what would be a trick for the number 3. I will presume you would mean the way to tell if a number is a multiple of 3. A number is a multiple of 3 if the sum of its digits is also a multiple of 3. For example 585 is a multiple of 3 since' 5+8+5 = 18 which is a multiple of 3. The number 47 is not a multiple of 3 because 4+7 equals 11 and that is not a multiple of 3. There is a second digit that has a similar rule for multiplicity. That digit is 9, which just happens to equal 32 . In fact, since 18 is a multiple of 9, 585 must be a multiple of 9 also.
Not in a way that would be generally understood. However, it is possible. An 8-digit number in base 10 can be represented by a 5-digit number in base 32. For example, extending the scheme for labeling digits for base 32, VVVVV32 = 3355443110 Similarly, the 8-digit number 33333333 in base 4 is the 5-digit number 65535 in base 10
32 is the largest factor of 32 and 96.
8*number = 3-digit number start by knowing basic times tables 1 through 9 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72 8*100 = 800 8*30 = 240 8*130 = 1040 8*20 = 160 8*120 = 960 8*4 = 32 8*124 = 992 the largest 3-digit number that is a multiple of 8 is 992
32 is the smallest two-digit number that can be multiplied by itself to give a four-digit number. (32x32)=1024
yes 16 digit number
32 x 32 = 1024
32
No.
There are several. 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96
ten-decillion
I'm not sure what would be a trick for the number 3. I will presume you would mean the way to tell if a number is a multiple of 3. A number is a multiple of 3 if the sum of its digits is also a multiple of 3. For example 585 is a multiple of 3 since' 5+8+5 = 18 which is a multiple of 3. The number 47 is not a multiple of 3 because 4+7 equals 11 and that is not a multiple of 3. There is a second digit that has a similar rule for multiplicity. That digit is 9, which just happens to equal 32 . In fact, since 18 is a multiple of 9, 585 must be a multiple of 9 also.
Not in a way that would be generally understood. However, it is possible. An 8-digit number in base 10 can be represented by a 5-digit number in base 32. For example, extending the scheme for labeling digits for base 32, VVVVV32 = 3355443110 Similarly, the 8-digit number 33333333 in base 4 is the 5-digit number 65535 in base 10
Prime factor all three.Find LCM by factor rules.Double or triple until you get a 4 digit number.18=2x3x324=2x2x2x332=2x2x2x2x22x2x2x2x2x3x3=32x9=288288,576,864,1152
No. Multiples can't be smaller than the number they are compared to.