Convert the mixed fraction to an improper fraction. Then you can simply exchange the numerator and the denominator.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago3 and a half = 7/2 so its multiplicative inverse is 2/7.
2 1/3 = 7/3 inverse of 7/3 is 3/7
-3/2
No, it is not. 3/5 is rational and its multiplicative inverse is 5/3 which is not an integer.
find the inverse of (1,-5)(3,-3)(4,-2)
Flip them upside down. The multiplicative inverse of 2/3 is 3/2
3 and a half = 7/2 so its multiplicative inverse is 2/7.
The reciprocal (multiplicative inverse) of -3 is -1/3.The reciprocal (multiplicative inverse) of -3 is -1/3.The reciprocal (multiplicative inverse) of -3 is -1/3.The reciprocal (multiplicative inverse) of -3 is -1/3.
2/3 and 3/2 are multiplicative inverses because they multiply to give you the multiplicative identity one.
Multiplicative inverses are two numbers whose product is one.Another name for multiplicative inverse is reciprocal. The reciprocal of 2/3 is 3/2. 2/3 X 3/2 = 6/6 = 1. The multiplicative inverse of 7 is 1/7. 7 X 1/7 = 7/7 = 1.
The multiplicative inverse of -24/7 is -7/24
2 1/3 = 7/3 inverse of 7/3 is 3/7
-3/2
The multiplicative inverse of 3 1/12 is 12/37.
The multiplicative inverse of -3 is -(1/3) or negative one-third. The multiplicative inverse of a number is the number that you multiply it by to get a result of 1 (the multiplicative identity). So, since -3 times -(1/3) is 1, -(1/3) is the multiplicative inverse of -3. Similarly, +3 is the ADDITIVE inverse of -3. The additive inverse of a number is the number you add to it to get a result of 0 (the additive identity). So, since -3 + (+3) = 0, +3 is the additive inverse of -3. The original answer given here was that the multiplicative inverse of -3 is +3, which is flat incorrect.
No, the multiplicative inverse is a number that when multiplied by the original gives 1 as the product. Also called the reciprocal. For example the multiplicative inverse of 2/3 is 3/2, because (2/3) x (3/2) = 1. Another example: If the number is -2, then the reciprocal is -1/2, so (-2) x (-1/2) = 1.
No, it is not. 3/5 is rational and its multiplicative inverse is 5/3 which is not an integer.