Want this question answered?
'Strange'. Rather than saying 'stranger' , we can say ' a strange person'.
An example of generalizing would be saying that all persons of a certain religion are evil. Another example of generalizing would be saying that something must be bad just because one person had a bad experience with it.
Because it is madeup of 3 tiny particle called proton,neutron,and electron.
Each example of a phenomenon may have several different possible explanations.For example, the fact that the stars appear fixed could possibly be explained by saying that they are very far away, and move relatively slowly. But we could also argue that maybe they are features of a 'firmament' - pin-pricks in a huge sphere enclosing the earth.It takes other items of evidence to help us decide which of the two explanations above are correct. Examples of this sort of discriminating evidence could be red-shift or apparent magnitude variation among main sequence stars. Both lines of evidence point to the stars not being fixed.The more independent lines of evidence we have that converge on a theory and that falsify other hypotheses, the more sure we can be that the theory is correct. It is consistent with all lines of evidence, and contradicted by none. Pseudoscience often neglects this requirement making ad hoc excuses in the cases where the evidence does not fit.
The Cosmic Microwave Background, discovered (almost by accident) in 1964, perfectly matches what the Big Bang Theory predicted. No other hypothesis can begin to explain it, beyond saying "Well, it's just there and I have no explanation why."
Does this evidence relate to what I am saying
Does this evidence relate to what I am saying
The best question to ask when selecting evidence to support a claim is "Is the evidence credible and reliable?" It is essential to ensure that the evidence comes from a trustworthy source and is backed up by relevant data or research.
He is challenging the "admissability" of the evidence (i.e.- he is saying that it is "nadmissable").
the person don't understand what you are saying
Hard Evidence is something like they have it on camera or something that shows you doing something cold evidence is someone saying you did it but not very many witnesses to say it. or they dont say the same thing
They are agreeing with you and saying that there is 'no doubt' to what you are saying.
It means that the person saying it wants to know the definition of what he is saying
There is none this is just a saying,an opinion,it can't be proved
Get the evidence of the message and report it to police
An example of an argument from subjectivity is saying that a movie is the best because it made you feel happy and entertained. This argument relies on personal feelings and experiences rather than objective criteria to determine the movie's quality.
Saying 'yes' is the same as saying 'OK' because you are agreeing with a person if you use one or the other of these words.