80
Yes, by definition a factor divides a number exactly
They are different by a factor of 10.
If you restrict yourself to whole numbers, 12 has 3 factor pairs: 1 x 12 2 x 6 3 x 4
is a 'factor' of the second number.
The number of square tiles is always equal to factor pairs. As an example, imagine a rectangle that contains 8 squares - 2 rows of 4. 2 X 4 = 8. In other words, the dimensions of the rectangles are ALWAYS equal to a factor pair of the number of squares in the rectangle. A rectangle containing 24 squares could be made as 24x1, 12x2, 8x3, or 6x4.
The factor pairs are the length and width of the rectangles.
One rectangle for each factor pair.
Number of factor pairs = number of rectangles
No single integer satisfies both requests. 80 is the only integer with exactly 5 factor pairs in that range, but it has two prime factors. 64 and 81 have one prime factor but 4 and 3 factor pairs respectively.
If you can compile a complete list of all different rectangular models with sides of integer length for a number then their lengths and breadths represent its factors.
1 x 12 2 x 6 3 x 4
One to one.
The areas are proportional to the square of the scale factor.
As I understand it, the number of factor pairs is equal to the number of rectangles.
Some people like to visualize factors as representing the lengths of sides of rectangles. In the same way that length times width equals area, factor times factor equals product.
Yes.
A factor of an experiment is a controlled independent variable; a variable whose the differences between means for different levels of one factor.