It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational. It is not an integer, whole number or irrational.
It is an integer. All integers are rational but not irrational. All rational and irrational numbers are real numbers.
No integer is an irrational number; all integers are rational.
rational integer whole number
The number 3 is a rational number (as is any integer).
It is real, rational, integer and a whole number.It is not an irrational number nor an interger - there is no such thing!
no it is an integer
47 is a whole number, integer and rational.
No because all integers are rational numbers
No integer is an irrational number. An irrational number is a number that cannot be represented as an integer or a fraction.All integers which are whole numbers are rational numbers.
-17 is a rational number, as is any integer.
15 is both rational, and an integer. is rational. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
Irrational. The square root of a positive integer is either an integer, or an irrational number.
By definition, an irrational number is a number that is not rational, or in other words a number that cannot be expressed as an integer divided by another integer. A number cannot be both "rational" and "not rational."
No. The square root of an integer is either an integer, or an irrational number.
-13 is rational and an integer.
It is rational, whole, integer and real but not natural nor irrational.
3.5 is real, rational, and natural. It's not irrational, integer, or whole.
No. Not only is it rational, it is an integer.
No, it is rational; it is also an integer.
No. An irrational number is one that is not a rational number. A rational number is once that equals one integer divided by another. So an irrational number cannot be represented by one integer divided by another integer, so it cannot be an integer!
No. No integer (whole number) is irrational.