Elephants.
Additional answer
Two tons.
No. A gallon weighs about 8 pounds, and a ton is 2,000 pounds.
They weigh the same, a ton is equivelant to 1000 Kilograms, if it helps you will need a lot more of feathers than Gold to make a ton
It depends which ton you use. In the UK 1 ton = 1 long ton = 2240 lb → a ton of steel weighs more than 2000 lb of cotton. In the US 1 ton = 1 short ton = 2000 lb → both are the same (A "metric ton", or "tonne" is 1000 kg which is approx 2205 lb, a little less than 1 long ton.)
Neither, they both weigh a ton.
They weigh the same.
Anything that weighs in at more than a ton in weight, even if only measured in mircrogrammes!!
No. A gallon weighs about 8 pounds, and a ton is 2,000 pounds.
Whales weigh more than a ton and I believe elephants do to. Whales are your best bet though.
A ton of rocks weighs more. Since they both weigh a ton, then they weigh the same.
A computer would be closest to a lb. (Though it weighs more). A ton is 1000 lbs, and a computer weighs no where near that. An ounce (oz) is very light and a computer weighs a lot more than 1 oz.
They weigh the same, a ton is equivelant to 1000 Kilograms, if it helps you will need a lot more of feathers than Gold to make a ton
It depends which ton you use. In the UK 1 ton = 1 long ton = 2240 lb → a ton of steel weighs more than 2000 lb of cotton. In the US 1 ton = 1 short ton = 2000 lb → both are the same (A "metric ton", or "tonne" is 1000 kg which is approx 2205 lb, a little less than 1 long ton.)
Neither, they both weigh a ton.
They weigh the same.
Well lets just say they weigh the same. ==> Two tons of either one does.
Yankee Stadium
Last answer: "Depends of how you weigh them. A ton of cotton could weigh more than a ton of nails." Not true! A ton (2000 lbs) is just a ton. 1 thing that weighs exactly 2000 pounds, cant weigh more or less than another thing that weighs exactly 2000 pounds. This is very simple! How did you get this wrong? Or maybe he/she was referring to the fact that there are at least 3 different types of tons. I am not sure. Well anyway, the point is that they were wrong, and the question now has a correct, acceptable answer. :P