Ancient civilization slavery found its way through the Middle Ages in various parts of the world, it was not simply a "European" created institution.It had to do with the affairs at the time....
Portugal was a prominent slave trader and England had taken over much of South Africa and the Congo area. and meanwhile, more settlers were arriving in the Americas where there was much MORE land and more need for servants and slaves.
so in England some white country men got into the slave trade and gathered up as many people as they could (they were of course).... after capturing these africans, they were shipped off and sold.
its kind of like a demand for horses. any guy who needs money will go out and capture a mustang so that he can sell it for profit. sad to compare to animals :( but it was similar to the demand for slaves.
in addition. other Africans in the area who could speak English and understood the demand and layout helped capture entire villages and sold them off as well.
from there the slaves were shipped to the continental America and neighboring islands like the carribeans and Cuba.
They werent looking for Black people. Just people to be slaves and they happened to be African :'(
It had more to do with pure coincidence than race. Black people were not slaves because they were black, they were slaves because black people were selling other black people.
mostly because the people in the colonies needed cheap work and people to work without pay on their farms and in their shoppes.
Because of beliefs of superiority
Roman slavery was not based on race.
No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.
because of slavery and many other reasons
In most countries it is a crime in case of job preferring based on race and similar situations but not as a personal expression of opinion. Violence based on race is a hate crime.
No, except African slavery still exists. While both types of slavery were based on the need for a cheap labor force and in many cases to control a cultural minority, ancient slavery was based on who was defeated in battle or was sold into slavery (by a poor parent or as a debtor), not nessesarialy race, while American slavery was based on race above everything else. In ancient Rome for example, anyone who was in need of money could sell their son or daughter into slavery, even a Roman. They beleived that slaves were human beings, just of a lower social class. Many famous Romans even encouraged good treatment of slaves on moral grounds. In American slavery, however, African-Americans were seen as inferior and not even human, simply animals or farm equipment.
Roman slavery was not based on race.
No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.
yes
because of slavery and many other reasons
Slavery was based on strong ancient civilizations conquering weaker ones. From ancient times slavery was based on a defeated culture being made slaves by a more powerful culture.
i dont know jeez?
Racial slavery is the process of enslaving a group of people based on the race that they belong to. One of the most familiar and widespread forms of racial slavery was the slavery of blacks in the U.S.
This law says that people who were not white and not Christian could be made slaves. It also says these people were "real estate," that is, property. This shows that the United States had chattel slavery, and that this slavery was based on race and religion.
Slavery became linked with racism through the process of racialization, where African people were systematically dehumanized and categorized as inferior based on their race. This served to justify their enslavement and perpetuate a system of racial hierarchy. Over time, ideas of inherent racial differences and white superiority became deeply ingrained in society, solidifying the association between slavery and racism.
Race and slavery have become almost synonymous because slaves were all the same race. If the majority of slaves were white, this could have extended to the Caucasian race.
In most countries it is a crime in case of job preferring based on race and similar situations but not as a personal expression of opinion. Violence based on race is a hate crime.
No, except African slavery still exists. While both types of slavery were based on the need for a cheap labor force and in many cases to control a cultural minority, ancient slavery was based on who was defeated in battle or was sold into slavery (by a poor parent or as a debtor), not nessesarialy race, while American slavery was based on race above everything else. In ancient Rome for example, anyone who was in need of money could sell their son or daughter into slavery, even a Roman. They beleived that slaves were human beings, just of a lower social class. Many famous Romans even encouraged good treatment of slaves on moral grounds. In American slavery, however, African-Americans were seen as inferior and not even human, simply animals or farm equipment.