Q: Where was the real Number two?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

It was the successor to the successor of the number 0.

It is the space between two real numbers.

It is an irrational number, which is a kind of real number.

Yes, I can't think of any way that a real number minus another real number would be complex or purely imaginary. My answer is yes.

Yes. Rational numbers are always the quotient of two integers. Integers are always real, and you cannot divide a real number by another real number and get an imaginary number. So, true.

Related questions

No. Not if the second number is zero.

Yes, a rational number is a real number. A rational number is a number that can be written as the quotient of two integers, a/b, where b does not equal 0. Integers are real numbers. The quotient of two real numbers is always a real number. The terms "rational" and "irrational" apply to the real numbers. There is no corresponding concept for any other types of numbers.

It was the successor to the successor of the number 0.

It is the space between two real numbers.

Yes.

A real number is any number so yes it is always a real number * * * * * Except if the second number is 0, in which case the quotient is not defined.

It is an irrational number, which is a kind of real number.

Yes, I can't think of any way that a real number minus another real number would be complex or purely imaginary. My answer is yes.

Yes. Rational numbers are always the quotient of two integers. Integers are always real, and you cannot divide a real number by another real number and get an imaginary number. So, true.

Negative and positive

An irrational number.

When it is a real number that cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers.