(3 x 12) + (4 x 12) = 7 x 12 = 84
Using my knowledge of greatest common factors and the distributive property, I can tell that 45 + 63 is equal to 9(5 + 7) or 9 x 12, which is 108. Of course, I could also tell that from my knowledge of addition.
The GCF is 16.
The GCF of 24 and 30 is 6. The distributive property states that 24 x 30 = (20 x 30) + (4 x 30)
You need at least two numbers to find a GCF.
The GCF of 24 and 64 is 8. You use the distributive property to show another way to write the sum. 8(3 + 8)
28ab
Using my knowledge of greatest common factors and the distributive property, I can tell that 45 + 63 is equal to 9(5 + 7) or 9 x 12, which is 108. Of course, I could also tell that from my knowledge of addition.
The GCF is 16.
The GCF of 24 and 30 is 6. The distributive property states that 24 x 30 = (20 x 30) + (4 x 30)
You need at least two numbers to find a GCF.
Suppose x and y are two terms with GCF k where the assumption (in this context) is that k is greater than 1. That implies that x = pk and y = qk where p and q are coprime terms. Then x + y = pk + qk and, using the distributive property, this is k*(p + q).
The GCF of 24 and 64 is 8. You use the distributive property to show another way to write the sum. 8(3 + 8)
It is not possible to give a sensible answer to this question. The greatest common factor (GCF) refers to a factor that is COMMON to two or more numbers. You have only one number in the question! It does not matter whether you use the distributive or any other property; something that does not exist cannot be found!
The GCF is 18. The Distributive property states that 36 x (50 + 4) = (36 x 50) + (36 x 4)
Since 18 is a factor of 36, it is automatically the GCF of this problem.
An unnecessary one. 42 + 96 = 138
The greatest common factor (GCF) refers to a factor that is COMMON to two or more numbers. YOu have only one term "8 + W" in the question so there cannot be a GCF. It is not possible to find any factor (other than 1 and 8 + W, itself, without further information about W.The distributive property has no relevance to this question.