yes
Both numbers are equal. That means neither on is bigger. It is a trick question.
Yes, It is. It is behind the decimal. The more numbers behind the the decimal the lower the number.
Not necessarily. They are simply two different ways of writing numbers that can be big or small.
No it is not because the numbers after the decimal point is seen as single numbers like 6 and 4 but not as '64' so 0.7 Is bigger than 0.64
Suppose you have two decimal numbers, A and B. If A - B > 0 then A is the bigger decimal, if A - B < 0 then B is the bigger decimal and if A - B = 0, neither is bigger.
Repeating decimal. * * * * * It depends on the numbers! For example, 0.6 < 0.66... < 0.67 By the first inequality the repeatiing decimal is bigger, by the second the terminating one is bigger.
yes
In decimal numbers the whole number re on the left side of the decimal point. So the whole numbers are 2 and 1. 2 is always bigger than one
Both numbers are equal. That means neither on is bigger. It is a trick question.
Yes, It is. It is behind the decimal. The more numbers behind the the decimal the lower the number.
3.2 (the numbers on the LEFT of the decimal determine which number is biggest)
Since neither of these numbers has a decimal point, it can only be inferred that you are referring to integers - of which 788 is larger than 787.
Not necessarily. They are simply two different ways of writing numbers that can be big or small.
a bigger decimal
No it is not because the numbers after the decimal point is seen as single numbers like 6 and 4 but not as '64' so 0.7 Is bigger than 0.64
53.125 is bigger than 52.916666.