I would compare lamps of the same wattage to see which one puts out more lumens, which is the measurement of actual light output.
A greater percentage of light, and a smaller percentage of infrared radiation and heat.
Heat
Mercury's ionization energy is 24.10
While fluorescent lamps may lower your electricity bill, they're not really 'good for the environment', as they require more energy and resources to manufacture compared with incandescent lamps, and they contain mercury.
Mercury is a metal unlike water which have hydrogen bonding. Mercury does not wet most substances, because of its high cohesion and low adhesion to the glass mercury will not wet glass. Cohesion, along with adhesion(attraction between unlike molecules), can help explain mercury phenomena. Mercury has a surface energy over 6 times greater than that of water so there is a much greater attractive force between the atoms of mercury than between the molecules of water, so mercury does not wet glass.
It depends on the efficiency of the machine. No machine is perfect and there are always losses and waste. Usually the losses are a greater percentage than the useful energy.
hh
It varies, depending on the specific model, but an energy-saving (fluorescent) light bulb should save at least half the energy, for the same luminosity, compared to the old-fashioned incandescent light bulbs. The incandescent light bulbs ought to be outlawed, except for specific purposes where the heat they generate is actually needed.
No. The incandescent bulb uses electrical energy and the light stick uses chemical energy.
A greater percentage of light, and a smaller percentage of infrared radiation and heat.
Greater than what? Compared to what? This question cannot be answered as currently posed.
warm blooded
Heat.
heat energy
incandescent bulbs
heat energyheat energy
heat energyheat energy