That term, over there!
There is no difference between improper subset and equal sets. If A is an improper subset of B then A = B. For this reason, the term "improper subset" is rarely used.
The set of counting numbers is the positive integers. The set of whole numbers is the positive integers plus zero. The term "natural numbers" has been used interchangeably with both of those sets.
I don't think such a term is used in set theory. A proper subset, on the other hand, is a subset of the set, that is not equal to the set itself. The difference is comparable to the difference between "greater than" and "greater-or-equal", for real numbers.
"Subset" IS the math term in this case.
I thinl the term you want is integers.
There is no difference between improper subset and equal sets. If A is an improper subset of B then A = B. For this reason, the term "improper subset" is rarely used.
The set of counting numbers is the positive integers. The set of whole numbers is the positive integers plus zero. The term "natural numbers" has been used interchangeably with both of those sets.
I don't think such a term is used in set theory. A proper subset, on the other hand, is a subset of the set, that is not equal to the set itself. The difference is comparable to the difference between "greater than" and "greater-or-equal", for real numbers.
"Subset" IS the math term in this case.
A pattern formed by 2 sets of numbers.
It is a Term.
The set of real numbers.
I thinl the term you want is integers.
"Densest" is not really an applicable term here. I take it you mean "has the highest cardinality?" In this cast there are an infinite number of these. A theorem states (I forget the name) that a subset of a set can have at most the same cardinality of that set. So we need a set S such such that S ⊆ ℝ and |S| ≈ |ℝ|. Like I said, many sets fit this description, i.e. ℝ itself, any open or closed interval on ℝ like [1,16) or (-∞, 3), any union of any subset of ℝ and an open or closed interval on ℝ such as (12, ∞) ∪ {e}. I suppose that there are many types that I may be forgetting, but I hope you understand. =]
a monomial itself is not a real number because it ia a vocabulary term, however, real numbers and vairables can be monmials.
Found out it is an "OR"statement
It is a monomial.