They were needed for large plantations, and to make food and things like that.
the people were too lazy to do stuff themselves
i think it is South Carolina
Southern Colonies had slaves to do their work on the plantation, Middle Colonies had some slaves but they were kinda in the middle, while the New England Colonies had no slaves.
By 1750, about 200,000 slaves lived in the colonies.
Slaves were held in all thirteen of the original colonies. Or True.
Britain only needed slaves to work plantations in the British colonies. They were not used in Britain itself. Britain abolished slavery well before American did.
To answer a question we need a who, what, when, where, why or how. Your question needs a what.
No not all of the 13 colonies had slaves only if the colony had tobacco then did they need slaves.
cause they did not need them
how many slaves were there int he colonies in 1671
i think it is South Carolina
Southern Colonies had slaves to do their work on the plantation, Middle Colonies had some slaves but they were kinda in the middle, while the New England Colonies had no slaves.
There were no slaves in northern colonies.
By 1750, about 200,000 slaves lived in the colonies.
Slaves were held in all thirteen of the original colonies. Or True.
Barley any slaves.
At some point all 13 colonies had slaves. They were not just owned by rich farmers. Even working class people in the Northern colonies owned slaves.
No. By the mid 1700's slavery had been outlawed in several northeastern states. Yet, the Black citizens did not escape discrimination in those states. The southern states because of the need for slaves due to crop production held the largest population of slaves. Yes, they were.