A village would have a greater need for government than a hunter-gatherer band because in a village there people. In a hunter-gatherer band you would need a leader since their are less people.
I hope this answered your question. :)
A village has a greater need for a government than a hunter-gatherer band because a village has more people in a hunter-gather band. Since there is more people in a village than a hunter-gatherer band more things could go worse. Such as more crimes could be committed. In a hunter-gather band, no one really owns anything except maybe their small hut so there is nothing to steal.
A village would have a greater need for government than a hunter-gatherer band because in a village there people. In a hunter-gatherer band you would need a leader since their are less people. I hope this answered your question. :)
to be good hahah you're trying to cheat not today
is
A hunter gatherer and a farmer both acquire food for themselves and others.
Eventually the development of language made hunter-gatherer societies stay in one place and build farms. There are still hunter-gatherer societies in the world today.
A hunter-gatherer
one can be that an agricultural farmer will have a less-varied diet than a hunter-gatherer, therefore he will die or get sick faster than a person in a hunter-gatherer society
what important factor brought changes to the hunter-gatherer way of life was that
An important effect that hunter-gatherer societies may have had on the environment was, EXTINCTION.
Characteristics of hunter-gatherer societies included the fact that they tended to be small communities and somewhat nomadic in nature.
A hunter gatherer is a forager in a nomadic society, who gets food from wild plants and animals. The Nomadic people of Central Asia were hunter gatherers.
Nomads.