An angle of 133 degrees is an obtuse angle because it is greater than 90 but less than 180 degrees.
Oh, what a happy little number we have here! To round 133 to the nearest 10, we look at the digit in the tens place, which is 3. Since 3 is less than 5, we keep the tens digit the same and change all other digits to the right to 0. So, 133 rounded to the nearest 10 is 130. Just a gentle adjustment to bring a little more balance and harmony to our number world.
155 is 16.54% more than 133. (rounded)
133 is a composite number because it has more than two factors
1 oz = 28.35 g and since we are going from a smaller unit to a larger one, we divide by the factor. 133 / 28.35 = 4.691 oz ■
It could be 105, 112 or 133. Having 7 as a factor means it is a multiple of 7. The first 3 digit multiple of 7: 100 ÷ 7 = 14 2/7 → first 3 digit multiple of 7 is 15 × 7 = 105 Last 3 digit multiple of 7 less than 140: 140 ÷ 7 = 20 → last 3 digit multiple of 7 less than 140 is 19 × 7 = 133 → The possible multiples of 7 to consider are [15..19] × 7 which gives 105, 112, 119, 126 and 133. The sum of the digits of these number is: 105 → 1 + 0 + 5 = 6 112 → 1 + 1 + 2 = 4 119 → 1 + 1 + 9 = 11 126 → 1 + 2 + 6 = 9 133 → 1 + 3 + 3 = 7 Of these sums only 6, 4 and 7 are less than 9, thus the possible numbers are 105, 112 or 113.
133 is.
No, fluorine has a larger ionic radius than bromine. This is because fluorine, being in the second row of the periodic table, has fewer electron shells than bromine, which is in the fourth row. As you move down a group in the periodic table, the atomic size tends to increase.
Yes. 1.5 has a larger number in the tenths place than 1.33. Think about it this way: if you multiply both by 100 you would have 150 and 133, 150>133.Hope this helps:)
yes it is
No, you have to be better than 133. too bad you suck
10% off of 133 = 10% discount applied to 133 = 133 - (10% * 133) = 133 - (0.10 * 133) = 133 - 13.3 = 119.70