0
Deductive reasoning goes from a general to a specific instance.
For example, if we say all primes other than two are odd, deductive reasoning would let us say that 210000212343848212 is not prime.
Here is a more "classic"example of deductive reasoning.
All apples are fruits
All fruits grow on trees
Therefore, all apples grow on trees
What else can I help you with?
What is a Line of Reasoning?
In general terms, a line of reasoning is a thought-process through which someone (or, a group of persons) arrives at a conclusion or insight of some kind. Beginning with a question, or perhaps a problem to be solved, the mind (or minds) involved takes step after intellectual step in order to figure out the truth, the solution, the goal, the next steps, etc.
Why does drawing a conclusion come at the end of research?
Because the conclusion is based on what has been found out through doing the research. If you haven't done any research how can you come to any conclusion
Debate in English about end is more important than mean?
The question tag suggests : Is Debate in English about : end is more important than mean would imply two factors 1. End 2. MeansEnd in any English debate is the conclusion through logic while mean is the tools applied eg logical deductive/inductive or completely illogical.previous comment: WikiANSWERS is a site for answering questions with a definitive answer and not a debate and discussion site. Suggest that you move this premise to a blog, chatroom or discussion site.
What would be a good ending sentence for an autobiography?
We do not know anything about your life! WikiAnswers will not write your conclusion for you, but we WILL help you learn how to do it yourself! Click on the related link to learn more about conclusions. You need to decide what sentence best explains your topic! Nobody else can give you a "good conclusion" because our ideas will support your topic. If you just start writing, you will be through with your assignment before you know it!
What does reasonable mean?
Reasoning is a thought process involving logic. Rather than making arbitrary or "gut" decisions, choices can be made by going through the rationale supporting each action and deciding what is logical.
Inductive reasoning creates a conclusion that's likely to be?
Inductive reasoning creates a conclusion that is likely to be true based on the evidence or patterns observed. It involves making generalizations from specific observations to form a broader understanding. However, the conclusion reached through inductive reasoning is not guaranteed to be true, as it is based on probability rather than certainty.
What is a logical conclusion?
A logical conclusion is a judgment or result reached through reasoning and evidence that follows logically from the premises or information presented. It is the final step in the process of deductive or inductive reasoning where one can infer what is most likely or probable based on the information available.
Inductive reasoning is empirical in nature which means that it is based on what?
Inductive reasoning is empirical in nature, meaning it is based on observations and past experiences. It involves drawing general conclusions from specific examples or instances. However, the conclusions reached through inductive reasoning are not guaranteed to be true, as they rely on the evidence available at the time.
How is the forming of a hypothesis accomplished?
Through inductive reasoning
What are the differences between results and conclusions?
A conclusion is a decision reached through reasoning. A result usually thought of as the product of a mathematical process. So a result is on kind of conclusion.
What is the description of inductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning (I learned this in geometry) is reasoning in which you use observations rather than direct information to solve a problem. For example, instead of using a data table to determine something, you would use LOGIC, OBSERVATIONS, and INFERENCES to come to a conclusion. Hope this helps! :)
Is it true that forming a hypothesis is accomplished through inductive reasoning?
true
What type of reasoning is used when a scientist tests a hypothesis?
A scientist uses inductive reasoning when testing a hypothesis. This involves making generalizations based on specific observations or data. By testing the hypothesis through experiments or observations, the scientist can gather evidence to support or refute the hypothesis.
Inductive reasoning is empirical in nature?
Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or data. It is empirical in nature because it relies on evidence collected through observation or experiment to draw conclusions about broader patterns or trends.
What is the difference between inductive an deductive method?
Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as a "top down" approach, in other words deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. It often starts with a theory and is then narrowed down to an actual, testable hypothesis, that can be confirmed or denied by observation. Inductive reasoning is the inverse approach, a "bottom up" approach. It begins with an observation and through observation patterns and regularities are observed and can be applied to a more generalized theory.
What process is usdd in this example you have learned that all living things use energy your dog is a living thing she must use energy?
inductive reasoning Deductive Reasoning A+
What describes a conclusion reached through observation?
A conjecture
