You don't convert linear meters to square meters or vice versa; those two units are totally incompatible.
You don't convert linear meters to square meters or vice versa; those two units are totally incompatible.
You don't convert linear meters to square meters or vice versa; those two units are totally incompatible.
You don't convert linear meters to square meters or vice versa; those two units are totally incompatible.
You don't convert linear meters to square meters or vice versa; those two units are totally incompatible.
80
36 square metres
The answer depends on whether the area is 16 inches * 36 inches, 16 yards x 36 yards, miles, metres or some other units.
The answer depends on the units used for 36 and 20. Are the feet, inches, miles, metres? Since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
324 square feet.
24 x 36 = 864 square feet.
36ft² = 3.34m²
48 metres * 36 metres = 18600.04 square feet
3.34 square meters.
36 square metres
36 sq ft = 3.34 square metres (approx).
None. A linear metre is a measure of length while a square metre is a measure of area. There is no concordance between the two.
36 square metres!
A square with 6 metres sides would have an area of 6 metres x 6 metres which is 36 square metres.
There are 0.3048 metres in one foot. Therefore, 36 feet is equal to 36 x 0.3048 = 10.9728 metres.
3" * 36" = 108 sq in = 0.0697 sq metres (to 4 dp)
23.77 m long and 8.23 meters wide for tennis competitions for single and double is 10.97 meters.
The answer depends on whether the area is 16 inches * 36 inches, 16 yards x 36 yards, miles, metres or some other units.