answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

2

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

2

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How much more than 9P are 3 twos and fives?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How many fives are equal in value to 25 twos?

Well, 25 twos is equal to 50. So 10 fives are equal equal to 25 twos.


How many fives are equal in value 15 TWOs?

6 fives


How many twos have the same value as twenty fives?

qq


How many fives are in 15 twos?

15 twos are 30 and 30 divided by 5 is 6 so the answer is 6


How much more than 9p are 3 twos and a five?

2


How many Twos are worth 2 Fives?

2


I am a number between 24 and 34 you get to me when you count by twos you get to me when you count by fives what number am I?

30


How much more than 9 p are 3 twos and a five?

11 - 9p.


Does lightning strike more then ones?

no it strikes twos, threes fours and fives and sixes, but it is scared of 7, 8, and 9. because seven ate nine


How many fives are equal in value to 15 twos?

15 x 2 = 3030 = 5 x 6


How many fives have the same value as the sum of 2 tens and 10 twos?

8 (sum means add 2x10 +10x2 =40 then divide by 5 to find the amount of fives that fit=8)


What is the name of the device that the Romans used for calculations?

An abacus. The roman abacus worked on the same principle as the Japanese abacus, but looked very different. The Japanese one had a number of beads strung on wires, grouped in twos and fives. The roman one was a small slab of stone, with small round depressions cut into the surface. These were arranged in straight lines and grouped in twos and fives. The Romans put pebbles into the depressions, and manipulated them in just the same way as the Japanese did their beads, though rather more slowly. If you know roman numerals, you will know that they are grouped in twos and fives. Incidentally, the latin word for pebble is calculus. So, the word calculate . . .