7,45,677
133 rounded off the nearest 100 is 100.
100
In whole numbers, rounding to the nearest ten is better. And in decimals, rounding to the nearest hundreth is more accurate.
Rounding to the nearest hundredths is the same as rounding to 2 decimal places. In this case it is 100.00
-- If you're rounding to the nearest 100, then it's 750 . -- If you're rounding to the nearest 50, then it's 775 . -- If you're rounding to the nearest 20, then it's 790 . -- If you're rounding to the nearest 10, then it's 795 . -- If you're rounding to the nearest 5, then it's 798 .
157.93 plus 104.52 = 262.45Rounding to the nearest hundred this becomes 300. Rounding to the nearest ten this becomes 260.In this instance rounding to the nearest ten is more reasonable.
99.5 rounds to 100 anything less 99.499999999 will round to 99 if you mean that you are rounding to the nearest integer. * * * * * Alternatively, any number larger than 50 will be rounded up to 100 when rounding to the nearest 100.
It depends on whether you are rounding to the nearest integer, nearest ten, nearest 50, nearest 100 or something else.
Im not sure actually. But rounding to the nearest number means its easier probably.
-- If rounding to the nearest 300, then 749 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 200, then 699 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 150, then 674 is. -- If rounding to the nearest hundred, then 649 is. -- If rounding to the nearest twenty, then 609 is. -- If rounding to the nearest ten, then 604 is.
8320: to the nearest 10 8325: to the nearest 25 8300: to the nearest 50 8300: to the nearest 100 8250: to the nearest 250 and so on.
There is no universal "better". Rounding off is a trade-off between reducing the accuracy and simplifying calculations. Also, if there are other numbers in an addition that are rounded to the nearest hundred, there is no point in rounding your number to the nearest ten.