Hey
To make the mean true, the student will need to get 94. To make the mode true, the student will need to get 86. To make the median true, the student will need to get 85. As we can see, the three numbers are not the same number. It is impossible the make the three statements true.
William Harrison Conover has written: 'School marks as related to student ability in the Vancouver High School' -- subject(s): Grading and marking (Students), Intelligence tests, Educational tests and measurements
No. Intelligence tests cannot determine how sucessful a student can be.
she wants you
Quotation marks.
The most difficult part of student life is studying. Proper studying habits ensure a student is able to pass their tests and classes.
No, she was a straight A student.
No, not if the student understands the material and knows how to take the tests and exams.
You would only get high marks if you revised and worked as hard as you can
· It is essential that impact tests be standardized both for the administration and scoring of the test. Impact tests are intended to measure the knowledge of a student, no matter which classroom they've been educated in. In order to do so, the test must measure knowledge that is objective; the student either knows the correct answer and thus possesses said knowledge, or they do not. By standardizing impact tests so that each student receives the same types of question in a standardized manner, a student's true knowledge can be tested without giving any one student an unfair advantage. Similarly, when it comes to scoring impact tests, by using objective questions, the likelihood of human error in scoring is greatly reduced. Rather than a scorer subjectively scoring an answer, only one answer is correct. Not only does this greatly reduce the likelihood of a test being scored unfairly or incorrectly, but it allows the use of automated scoring machines, even further reducing the possibility of error. By standardizing impact tests, the scores and data produced are more reliable, comparable among students, and gained as fairly and equally by the students as possible.
Group IQ tests administered to students can create a self-fulfilling prophecy by influencing teachers' expectations of student performance. If a student receives a low IQ score, teachers may unintentionally provide less challenging work or lower their expectations for that student, which can affect the student's actual performance and reinforce the initial low IQ score. This cycle perpetuates a belief in the student's lower intelligence, regardless of their true abilities.
24/160 = 0.15 = 15%