If these were weights of people then it suggests that the heavier the people the shorter the distance they were willing (or able!) to walk.
That's a question that can only really be answered via a study. Take a random sample of people (from your school for example) and plot their weight against their average daily walking distance (you may have to make your subjects carry a pedometer during the study period). Do you see a negative relationship on the graph?As a second step, calculate the correlation coefficient. As negative correlation gets stronger the correlation coefficient will get closer to -1.
Negative correlation implies an inverse relationship between a person's weight and the amount of distance that they walk (say on an average day). So you can conclude that heavier people are more likely to walk less. Lighter people are more likely to walk more.Remember though that correlation does not always equate to causation. What this means in practical terms is that walking more does not necessarily mean you'll lose weight. Conversely, walking less does not necessarily mean that you'll gain weight. Or thinking of it another way, losing weight will not necessarily cause you to walk more and gaining weight will not necessarily cause you to walk less.
A man walked past the mill in the afternoon, and the mill caught fire
Julian walked a distances of 2 meters Keira walked a distance of 300 centimeters. which distance is longer?
A man walked past the mill in the afternoon, and the mill caught fire.
I guess it depends on how large the steps are. For example, the larger the distance between each step, the further you will go.
Without seeing an actual maze, paths within the maze, and without a definition of whether one is discussing distance "as the crow flies", versus distance within the maze. The only conclusion one can come to is that the distance walked would be greater than or equal to (>=) the distance from the start. I.E. it is likely that the person didn't follow a straight line between the start and current position, and there was also some retracing of steps.
405978654 metres exactly. Walked it a while ago.
For the speed of a single pedestrian, measure the time it takes him/her to walk a set distance (for example 10 meters) and divide the distance by the time. For the average speed of a pedestrian find a large number of people and measure the speed of each person and find the average by summing all the speeds and dividing by the number of people who took the test.
Displacement is basically the total space between point A and point B. Commonly mistaken, displacement is different than distance. For example, if somebody walked 5 meters to the right, then 4 meters to the left, their displacement would be 1 meter, and their distance walked would be 9 meters.
Speedometer or pedometer.
Approximately one mile.