Want this question answered?
A rational number is a number that can be written in the form a/b, where "a" and "b" are integers and b is not equal to zero. For example, whole numbers are rational numbers.
Difference of two whole number is not always a whole number.For any two whole numbers a & b, a - b = whole number only when a is greater than or equal to b.* * * * *Wrong!Even if a is less than b, the difference is still a whole number. Whole numbers can be negative.So the correct answer to the question is "YES".
The first need arose when it was found that the set of whole numbers was not closed under division. That is, given whole numbers A and B (B non-zero), that, in general, A/B was not a whole number - but a fraction.
Integers are whole numbers, with no fraction or decimal part. Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed in the form a/b where a and b are both integers. Thus 1/2 is a rational number, but not an integer. 0.34343434... is a rational number (as it can be expressed as 34/99) but is not an integer.
The standard form for a number is a way of representing numbers, usually very large or very small, in the form a*10b where 1 <= |a| < 10 is a decimal number and b is an integer (negative or positive). a is called the mantissa and b is called the exponent.
A rational number is a number that can be written in the form a/b, where "a" and "b" are integers and b is not equal to zero. For example, whole numbers are rational numbers.
Difference of two whole number is not always a whole number.For any two whole numbers a & b, a - b = whole number only when a is greater than or equal to b.* * * * *Wrong!Even if a is less than b, the difference is still a whole number. Whole numbers can be negative.So the correct answer to the question is "YES".
Yes. A rational number is one that you can write as a fraction a/b, with integers a and b (b not equal to zero). For a whole number, set b = 1. For example, 5 = 5/1, so it is a rational number.
Yes. An improper fraction is defined as a fraction of the form a/b where a > b. This is still the ratio of two whole numbers which is what a rational number is.
Any number that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers ( whole numbers) providing the second number is not zero. In symbols a number that can be put in the form a/b where a and b are integers ,and b does not equal zero
Yes. 1.8 = 14/5 = 9/5 which is of the form a/b with a and b integers (whole numbers) so it is rational.
The first need arose when it was found that the set of whole numbers was not closed under division. That is, given whole numbers A and B (B non-zero), that, in general, A/B was not a whole number - but a fraction.
Integers are whole numbers, with no fraction or decimal part. Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed in the form a/b where a and b are both integers. Thus 1/2 is a rational number, but not an integer. 0.34343434... is a rational number (as it can be expressed as 34/99) but is not an integer.
The standard form for a number is a way of representing numbers, usually very large or very small, in the form a*10b where 1 <= |a| < 10 is a decimal number and b is an integer (negative or positive). a is called the mantissa and b is called the exponent.
20 is not irrational because it can be represented in the form a/b, where a and b are whole numbers and b is not 0.
Yes, a+bi is standard form for a complex number. The numbers (a) and (b) are both real and i is √(-1)
A number of the form (a + bi) is a complex number.