No, a square number means that when a number is multiplied by itself I gives you that number (ex: 3•3=9) but prime means that no numbers multiply to that number so it is impossible
60 is neither a square number nor a prime number.
No but it can be a square number because 1*1 = 1
An oxymoron. Prime numbers can't be square. Square numbers can't be prime. You can square a prime number: 3 x 3 - 32 = 9
A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.
a prime square
No square number can be a prime number and conversely.
113 is prime, not square.
210 is neither a prime number or a square number.
60 is neither a square number nor a prime number.
No but it can be a square number because 1*1 = 1
An oxymoron. Prime numbers can't be square. Square numbers can't be prime. You can square a prime number: 3 x 3 - 32 = 9
A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.
a prime square
1 is not considered a prime number; 1 is a perfect square.
49 is not a prime number. It is the square of the prime number 7.
No, never. It would be divisible by the prime number.
No, there are no prime numbers that are also square numbers. Prime numbers are only divisible by 1 and themselves, while square numbers have integer square roots. Since the square root of a prime number is not an integer, a prime number cannot be a square number.