Yes, older number systems tended not to use the zero. But that makes those number systems rather limited.
Zero.
Natural Numbers do not inculde 0
Systems of equations can have just about any number of solutions: zero, one, two, etc., or even infinitely many solutions.
Did u mean how to make a number zero?. If so, then the answer is to make a number zero, it is needed to multiply the number with Zero .
zero + zero = zero
No. A negative number is a number below zero, not zero itself.The number zero is neither negative nor positive.
A number multiplied by zero equals zero.
There is not always a zero at the end if the number. there is a zero if the number is divisible by five.
No number exists. ============ Zero is not a factor of any number but zero.
In number systems Rational number is not represented just by q . they are represented in the form of p and q . P/q is rational number where q is not equal to zero.
Because there was no symbol for zero in Sumerian or early Babylonian ... Base-60 number systems have also been used in some other cultures.
Zero is the value of nothing. Zero holds an absence of value in an equation So that's it? I still disagree. Although zero may signify"nothing", its worth is not. The concept of zero is invaluable in mathematics. Early number systems did not have a zero - what's the Roman numeral for zero, for example? Many also lacked place value, a concept for which a zero is necessary. I doubt the question was asked for the obvious answer, but to encourage some thinking about the real value of having a zero in our number system.