No. When we're talking about factors, primes, composites, etc., we're normally
talking about only whole numbers.
If things with decimals were acceptable as factors, there would be no such thing
as a Prime number, and every number would have an infinite number of factors.
True
This is not necessarily true. 2 x 0.55 = 1.1
False. 2 x 0.55 = 1.1
When you divide a number by another number that isn't a factor of the first number.
An infinite amount of numbers can theoretically be placed after the decimal point.
There are no decimal places in 40. Whether it is a factor or not is not relevant,
True
Not necessarily: for example, consider 0.5 * 4 = 2
This is not necessarily true. 2 x 0.55 = 1.1
To convert 2,000 pounds into a decimal number, you need to divide 2,000 by an appropriate conversion factor. The appropriate conversion factor for pounds to a decimal number is 1, as 1 pound is equal to itself. So, to convert 2,000 pounds to a decimal number: Decimal number = 2,000 pounds / 1 pound Decimal number = 2,000 Therefore, 2,000 pounds is equal to the decimal number 2,000.
False. 2 x 0.55 = 1.1
When you divide a number by another number that isn't a factor of the first number.
An infinite amount of numbers can theoretically be placed after the decimal point.
Divide the larger number by the smaller. If the result has no remainder (no decimal) then the smaller number is a factor of the larger.
The greatest common factor (or GCF) is the highest number that can divide into aanother number, and not have a decimal (whole number).
No. Because the square root is 990.61546525379866996907131624577..... No decimal places allowed!!
You need to add up the number of digits to the right of the decimal to find the number of digits in the answer. If the first factor has 2 digits to the right of the decimal point and the second factor has 3, the final answer will have 5 digits to the right of the decimal point.