Not sure what you mean by "solved".
A quadrillion is a whole number but I would much rather see 1*1015 than 1000000000000000 (have I got the correct number of 0s?). Even more important with numbers that are larger still.
440 is, itself, a whole number and, because it is a whole number, it is in its simplest form.
It is a whole number and its simplest form is 253.
589 is a whole number and it is in its simplest form.
It is a whole number and the simplest form is 33.
A whole number is in its simplest form: it cannot be simplified further.
There are two answers to this: 1) 8.14 × 10² (also known as scientific form). 2) 814 is already in standard form (as opposed to expanded form)
138 is already a whole number in simplest form.
It is already a whole number in the form of 12492
Somewhat paradoxically, this term does not have a standard definition! The definition below is based on the UK use of the term.The standard form, also known as the scientific form, is the representation of a number in the form a*10b where b is an integer and a is a real number.If, additionally, 1 ≤ a < 10, then the number is said to be in normalised scientific form. However, scientific form that is not normalised is rarely used. As a result it is usually assumed that a number in scientific form is in normalised scientific form.
A whole number is a number is a rational number which, in its simplest form has 1 as divisor. All other numbers are not whole number.
It is the whole number 124.
No.16 = 16/1 which is of the form of 'one whole number' over 'another whole number' which is the form of a rational number.