Yes.
Postulate, Corollary, Definition, & Theorem
Steps in a geometric proof do not require support
definition,postulate,theorem,& CorollaryDefinition, Theorem, Corollary, and PostulateA.PostulateB.DefinitionD.Algebraic property(answers for apex)a and cpostulate, theorem, and definition
definition,postulate,theorem,& CorollaryDefinition, Theorem, Corollary, and PostulateA.PostulateB.DefinitionD.Algebraic property(answers for apex)a and cpostulate, theorem, and definition
the theorems and postulates used in the proof
we use various theorems and laws to prove certain geometric statements are true
postulates
yes
Axioms, definitions, and theorms that have been proven.
There is no single statement that describes a geometric proof.
Both the algebraic proof and geometric proof are strong. The algebraic proof however is usually very involving.
No. A corollary goes a little bit further than a theorem and, while most of the proof is based on the theorem, the extra bit needs additional proof.