To prove this, we need to be able to prove two things:
First, let's prove that the product of two integers is always even if at least one integer is even:
Let's say that n is an even integer, and that k is some integer (even or odd). We want to prove that k*n has to be even. Since even is even, we can think of it as 2m, where m is some integer. In other words, n is equal to (2 + 2 + 2 + 2 ...) for however many twos it takes to get there.
We can re-write k*n as k*2m. We can factor out a 2 to get:
2*k*2m-1.
Since we are multiplying an integer quantity by two, this proves that the quantity has to be divisible by 2, which, by definition, means that the number must be even.
Now let's prove that the product of two integers is never even if neither integer is even. Let's call the two integers k and n. Since nither k and n are even, they must both be odd.
k*n can be re-written as k*n - n + n, which can be factored into (k-1)n + n.
Now we know that (k-1)n has to be even, since k-1 is even, and we have proved that a number times an even number is even above.
So now we have an even number plus and odd number. We can re-write n as 2m + 1, where m is an integer. Since (k-1)n is even, that quantity can be written as 2p, where p is an integer.
To recap so far, this means that we can say that if k and n are both odd:
k*n = (k-1)n + n = 2p + 2m + 1.
This can be re-written as 2p+m + 1. Since 2p+m is a multiple of two, it must be even, and an even number plus one must be odd, so the product of two odd numbers must be odd.
Take any two integers, and subtract one from another, you will have another integer. If there was a situation where you could show that this statement is not true, then that would prove your hypothesis, but I cannot think of any.
Mathematical induction is just a way of proving a statement to be true for all positive integers: prove the statement to be true about 1; then assume it to be true for a generic integer x, and prove it to be true for x + 1; it therefore must be true for all positive integers.
There are no such consecutive integer as is so simple to prove! Suppose the first integer is x. Then the next (consecutive) integer is x+1. Then 2*x + 4*(x+1) = 30 So that 2x + 4x + 4 = 30 6x + 4 = 30 6x = 30 - 4 = 26 x = 26/6 which is NOT an integer.
Suppose x is an even number and y is an odd number. Then x = 2*n for some integer n and y = 2*m + 1 for some integer m Therefore x + y = 2*n + 2*m + 1 = 2*(n + m) +1 Now, since n and m are integers, (n + m) is also an integer [by the closure of integers under addition]. Thus, x + y = 2*p + 1 where p = n + m is an integer. ie x + y is an odd integer.
It is quite easy to prove this using algebra. Suppose x is the smaller of the two odd integer. The fact that x is odd means that it is of the form 2m + 1 where m is an integer. [m integer => 2m is an even integer => 2m + 1 is odd] The next odd integer will be x + 2, which is (2m + 1) + 2 = 2m + 3 The sum of these two consecutive odd integers is, therefore, 2m + 1 + 2m + 3 = 4m + 4 = 4(m + 1) Since m is an integer, m+1 is an integer and so 4(m + 1) represents a factorisation of the answer which implies that 4 is a factor of the sum. In other words, the sum is a multiple of 4.
Because a is rational, there exist integers m and n such that a=m/n. Because b is rational, there exist integers p and q such that b=p/q. Consider a+b. a+b=(m/n)+(p/q)=(mq/nq)+(pn/mq)=(mq+pn)/(nq). (mq+pn) is an integer because the product of two integers is an integer, and the sum of two integers is an integer. nq is an integer since the product of two integers is an integer. Because a+b equals the quotient of two integers, a+b is rational.
The statement is not true. Disprove by counter-example: 3 is an integer and 5 is an integer, their product is 15 which is odd.
Yes. 0 is an integer and all integers are real numbers.
Take any two integers, and subtract one from another, you will have another integer. If there was a situation where you could show that this statement is not true, then that would prove your hypothesis, but I cannot think of any.
The product of an odd and even number will always have 2 as a factor. Therefore, it will always be even.
Mathematical induction is just a way of proving a statement to be true for all positive integers: prove the statement to be true about 1; then assume it to be true for a generic integer x, and prove it to be true for x + 1; it therefore must be true for all positive integers.
Because 6*8 = 48 and 48/8 = 6
In order to be a group with respect to addition, the integers must satisfy the following axioms: 1) Closure under addition 2) Associativity of addition 3) Contains the additive identity 4) Contains the additive inverses 1) The integers are closed under addition since the sum of any two integers is an integer. 2) The integers are associative with respect to addition since (a+b)+c = a+(b+c) for any integers a, b, and c. 3) The integer 0 is the additive identity since z+0 = 0+z = z for any integer z. 4) Each integer n has an additive inverse, namely -n since n+(-n) = -n+n = 0.
There are no such consecutive integer as is so simple to prove! Suppose the first integer is x. Then the next (consecutive) integer is x+1. Then 2*x + 4*(x+1) = 30 So that 2x + 4x + 4 = 30 6x + 4 = 30 6x = 30 - 4 = 26 x = 26/6 which is NOT an integer.
Call the two consecutive integers n and n+1. Their product is n(n+1) or n2 +n. For example if the integers are 1 and 2, then n would be 1 and n+1 is 2. Their product is 1x2=2 of course which is 12 +1=2 Try 2 and 3, their product is 6. With the formula we have 4+2=6. The point of the last two examples was it is always good to check your answer with numbers that are simple to use. That does not prove you are correct, but if it does not work you are wrong for sure!
Suppose x is an even number and y is an odd number. Then x = 2*n for some integer n and y = 2*m + 1 for some integer m Therefore x + y = 2*n + 2*m + 1 = 2*(n + m) +1 Now, since n and m are integers, (n + m) is also an integer [by the closure of integers under addition]. Thus, x + y = 2*p + 1 where p = n + m is an integer. ie x + y is an odd integer.
The answer depends on which properties are being used to prove which rules.