A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. Basically, if evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, then the hypothesis can become accepted as a good explanation of a phenomenon. One definition of a theory is to say it's an accepted hypothesis.
A law generalizes a body of observations. At the time it is made, no exceptions have been found to a law. Scientific laws explain things, but they do not describe them. One way to tell a law and a theory apart is to ask if the description gives you a means to explain 'why'.
As you can see, there is no 'proof' or absolute 'truth' in science. The closest we get are facts, which are indisputable observations. Note, however, if you define proof as arriving at a logical conclusion, based on the evidence, then there is 'proof' in science. I work under the definition that to prove something implies it can never be wrong, which is different. If you're asked to define hypothesis, theory, and law, keep in mind the definitions of proof and of these words can vary slightly depending on the scientific discipline. What is important is to realize they don't all mean the same thing and cannot be used interchangeably.
The big bang theory is a cosmological model. Is this really the question you are trying to ask?
Cell theory is one of many subdivisions of scientific theory. Therefore, since cell theory IS scientific theory, I don't see how you can compare them. This is like saying compare mammals to squirrels.
i have no clue i also want that answer for homework
A scientific theory is more elaborated than a simple hypothesis and generally is validated by experiments.
In science, "theory" is the name applied to well-established scientific knowledge. It doesn't mean that there are doubts about the atomic theory.
Compare and contrast the theories of scientific management with that of the human relations management approach.
Compare and contrast the legal theory of rights and the idealist theory of rights?
Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken.
compare and contrast theory of emotion
compare and contrast Expectancy Theory and Equity Theory
There are a number of ways you can compare and contrast a model with a theory. You could say that theories are conceptual and models are visual for example.
The scientific management theory by Taylor stressed on industrial efficiency and introduced the concept of "piece rate". Where as human relation management theory by mayo suggest that human resource can be motivated by incentives.
Scientific law is a rule that describes the behavior of something in nature, usually describes what will happen in a situation but not why it happened and scientific theory is an explanation that is supported by results from experimentation or testing.What they have in common is thwey both have something to do with science
compare glasser's choice theory on wants versus needs
compare glasser's choice theory on wants versus needs
A hypothesis is an educated guess on the possibility of some phenomena while a scientific theory is when the phenomena is confirmed by observation.
A hypothesis is just a formally declared thought, to turn it into a theory you must delve into the consequences of your hypothesis; and state how it can be tested (by others).