If you are asked to take an appropriate average from a box plot or cumulative frequency with a fairly even range either side of the box, use the mean, because it will be the most accurate. However, if there is an unusually high result, use the median because it will be unaffected by this result, and so less skewed. The mode is the most fashionable number, i.e. the result that occurs most. All it really does is give a rough idea of the average.
There is no direct relationship between the mean and mode.
It is a comparison between something holy and something not. "That man is like a god"
comparison mean not being fair if you use a sentence this how it sound like the comparison between Joseph and jack quite and unfair
In a symmetric distribution, the mean and the median are the same. Otherwise there is no relation. In symmetric distributions with only one mode, the mode will coincide with the mean and median, but otherwise there is no relation.
Analogy is basically just the comparison between two things.
The mean is affected the most by an outlier.
The computation form for sample variance is?
The mean, median, and mode are all measures of central tendency. For symmetrical distributions they all have the same value. For assymetrical distributions they have different values. The mean is the average and the mode is the most likely value.
it`s a comparison between two musical notes.
I think you mean "Steganography".
Its range, median, and mode.Range is the distance between the two farthest numbers out.Median is the middle number.And mode is the number that appears the most.
mode is the number that occurs the most and to find the mean/average, add all numbers, then divid that number by the number of numbers there were in your group of numbers.