No
The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.
One hundred.
It's safe to say that most of the Romans had slaves with the exception of the very poor.It's safe to say that most of the Romans had slaves with the exception of the very poor.It's safe to say that most of the Romans had slaves with the exception of the very poor.It's safe to say that most of the Romans had slaves with the exception of the very poor.It's safe to say that most of the Romans had slaves with the exception of the very poor.It's safe to say that most of the Romans had slaves with the exception of the very poor.It's safe to say that most of the Romans had slaves with the exception of the very poor.It's safe to say that most of the Romans had slaves with the exception of the very poor.It's safe to say that most of the Romans had slaves with the exception of the very poor.
Romans did not mine, they had slaves to do that for them.
slaves
the romans conquered their enemies and took the men as slaves
The Etruscans came to Italy first. Then the Romans developed. The Romans had many Greek slaves and they brought in slaves from other parts of the world.
Yes, but it was probably more like thousands of slaves. She was one of the founders of the Underground Railroad, an escape route used by slaves.
most Anciet egypt slaves were greeks and romans.
The Romans had a person to manage it and oversee the slaves.
They generally owned slaves.
In a small hut on the farm.