Yes.
In fact you need to be very good at mathematics. Both physics and engineering (the practical application of, primarily, physics) are essentially mathematical.
Certainly! All he needs to do is slough off his chemistry, physics, and engineering classes, and he can fail them just as solidly as if he were poor at math.Yes, to be very good in chemistry and physics and engineering you have to be good in mathTo be good in math you do not have to be very good in chemistry or physics or engineering
You HAVE to be good at mathematics to be good at chemistry, physics and engineering. It's not a handicap, it's a necessity.
Yes it is a possibility. There is no competition for a Pullitzer in Physics, Chemistry, or Engineering.
No, it is not true. It is false. In order to PASS physics, chemistry, and engineering, you must be pretty good at mathematics.
Not necessarily.
No.
That depends on many other factors. But I'd say that you're most likelyincapable of Chemistry, Physics, and Engineering if you're not good at Math.
Yes. Math is a fundamental tool in chemistry, physics, and engineering in the same way that being able to read is a fundamental tool in historical analysis. You cannot be good at chemistry, physics, or engineering without a firm grasp of math.
On the contrary, you NEED math, especially for physics and engineering.
I'm good at Math and I passed Chemistry.
Yes, math is more closely applicable to physics, chemistry, and engineering, than biology and programming are.
Because the majority of economics, physics and engineering and general chemistry requires you to be able to calculate, not just learning concepts.