Such a correlation is absurd.
Yes, math is more closely applicable to physics, chemistry, and engineering, than biology and programming are.
Not necessarily.
no
yes
No. You do not suck. You can truly . . . whatever the opposite is.
That depends on the individual
No, all the others are much more math-related than programming.
Certainly! All he needs to do is slough off his chemistry, physics, and engineering classes, and he can fail them just as solidly as if he were poor at math.Yes, to be very good in chemistry and physics and engineering you have to be good in mathTo be good in math you do not have to be very good in chemistry or physics or engineering
No. You do not suck. You can truly . . . whatever the opposite is.
No. You do not suck. You can truly . . . whatever the opposite is.
You HAVE to be good at mathematics to be good at chemistry, physics and engineering. It's not a handicap, it's a necessity.
I suppose that is possible to have success with minimal efforts in programming (of course, don't be completely stranger).