Yes
A rhombus would fit the given description
A square is always a rhombus, but a rhombus is notalways a square.
A square is always a rhombus, but a rhombus is notalways a square.
A rhombus is a tetragon (or quadrilateral, what ever you want to call it) has two sets of parallel lines, all which are the same length. A square fits the above description, therefore, a square is a rhombus. For a two dimentional object to be square, it must fit the descriptions for the rhombus as well as have 4 right angles.
no a square is not a rhombus
no a square is not a rhombus
FALSE a square is a rhombus but a rhombus is not a square
A rhombus that is not a square is a rhombus. A square is a special type of rhombus that has all four angles equal (to 90°).
Rhombus Not a SquareIn a square, the sides are perpendicular. In a rhombus, they aren't. A rhombus is never a square.
Yes, a square is a rhombus, but a rhombus is not a square. Yes, a rhombus has four sides of equal length. A square is a rhombus with four right angles.
A rhombus can be a square.
A square does indeed fit the definition of a rhombus if you defined it as any parallelogram with equal sides. A rhombus can also be defined as a parallelogram with opposite equal acute angles and opposite equal obtuse angles, and four equal sides. This definition does not allow for a square.