both
A ton of cotton and a ton of bricks both weigh the same amount, as they are both equivalent to 2,000 pounds. The difference lies in their volume and density, with cotton being less dense and occupying more space compared to bricks. Therefore, a ton of bricks would take up less space than a ton of cotton due to their differing densities.
Neither, they both weigh a ton.
Both weigh the same amount, a ton.
They both weigh the same, since a ton is a unit of weight and is equal to 2,000 pounds regardless of what the material is.
No, a ton of coal and a ton of bricks would both weigh the same amount, which is one ton. The weight is determined by the measurement unit (ton) and not the material being weighed.
A ton is a measure of weight, so they weigh the same provided they are wieghed on the same planet.... which shd be the case for a good comparison.... providing equal frames of reference....
As you said both are a ton so both will be weighing the same, one ton. (exception: a tonne (being 1,000 kg, ton is 2,000 lb))
A ton is a measurement of the weight of an object. No matter what the object is, if two items weigh a ton, then they are equal. A ton of bricks weighs exactly the same as a ton of feathers.
A. A ton of bricks. B. A ton of feather. C. It depends on the type of bricks. D. None of above
A ton of rocks weighs more. Since they both weigh a ton, then they weigh the same.
There are three measurements referred to as "ton" -Short ton (2,000 lbs.)Long ton (2,240 lbs.)Metric ton (or tonne, 1,000 kg./2204.6226218 lbs.)Assuming all three substances are measured in the same type of ton, they would all weigh the same - a ton is a unit of weight, not of density or area.
Depends on the density of the bricks you are referring to. If one brick was one cubic meter and weighed a ton then your answer would be 1. Similarly if it took 3424 bricks to weigh a ton and they were all half a cubic meter, then your answer would be 1712 cubic meters. You require more information.