8 1 6
3 5 7
4 9 2.
Draw diagonal lines to form a diagonal cross in each square, so dividing all the squares into four triangles in each. A pencil and a straightedge is all that is needed, no measuring to form vertical and horizontal lines to divide each square into four smaller squares is required. Can't show a photo or graphics in Answers, I believe.
A scatter plot, a line chart, a bar chart are some possible answers.
I know but I don't tell you. For answers, please call 99
There has been many different answers to this question, but the proper answer is two right angles. even though it doesn't look like!
Yes it will be less because if you take a net of a cube and find the surface area it would be for example 30cm2 and if it was cut in half it would be 15cm squared so its smallerCORRECT ANSWER:Neither. It will be more in area because although you have made two halves of a cube, you have added a new exposed side on each of the halves, thus making 2 sides the same size as the cube. It will lessen by half the area on 4 of the sides which are bisected. So you get the same area that you started with. The above formula is close, but did not account for the other half. Hooweestiki.==========================THE ANSWERS ABOVE ARE WRONG.==========================Here's why...First, picture a cube one inch on a side.Each side is one square inch; Six square inches total of SURFACE AREA .-------------------SCENARIO #1-------------------A slice (either vertical or horizontal) will add TWO (2) more sides, each being an additional square inch, for a sum total of eight (8) square inches.An increase of 2 sq. in. over the original six (6) sq. in. is an increase of 33 percent. So, for vertical or horizontal halving, the formula is, as follows:[ORIGINAL SURFACE AREA times 1.33]-------------------SCENARIO #2-------------------But if you halve the cube on a diagonal, the resultant new surfaces will be oblong, measuring 1" by 1.414" (the Square Root of two) adding almost another square inch of surface area.2 x ( 1 x 1.414) = 2.828 square inchesThe total SURFACE AREA is now 8.828 (when halved on the DIAGONAL).This is an INCREASE of 47.13333 percent.Resultant formula:[ORIGINAL SURFACE AREA times 1.4713]-------------------THEREFORE-------------------FINALLY, the answer to your question is somewhere between these two extremes, because your cut will be neither a perfect vertical cut, nor a perfect diagonal cut.
The answers are: *vertical lines *horizontal lines *jagged lines *dynamic lines
The foliation in metamorphic minerals is always perpendicular to the direction of pressure. E.g. Vertical pressure is applied, the foliation will be horizontal, and vice-versa, the pressure is horizontal you get vertical foliation. From yahoo answers
this is a useless and frustrating site which has no answers to offer. A very rubbish website.
Draw diagonal lines to form a diagonal cross in each square, so dividing all the squares into four triangles in each. A pencil and a straightedge is all that is needed, no measuring to form vertical and horizontal lines to divide each square into four smaller squares is required. Can't show a photo or graphics in Answers, I believe.
A scatter plot, a line chart, a bar chart are some possible answers.
There can be various answers to that. If you are talking about gridlines, then at its simplest, it could be a single cell. You could also have a set of data forming a table on a worksheet, as opposed to the blank areas, though they would also have vertical and horizontal gridlines. Sections bounded by horizontal gridlines are rows. Sections bounded by vertical gridlines are columns.
finding vertical asymptotes is easy. lets use the equation y = (2x-2)/((x^2)-2x-3) since its a rational equation, all we have to do to find the vertical asymptotes is find the values at which the denominator would be equal to 0. since this makes it an undefined equation, that is where the asymptotes are. for this equation, -1 and 3 are the answers for the vertical ayspmtotes. the horizontal asymptotes are a lot more tricky. to solve them, simplify the equation if it is in factored form, then divide all terms both in the numerator and denominator with the term with the highest degree. so the horizontal asymptote of this equation is 0.
Column grid lines.
I know but I don't tell you. For answers, please call 99
Although I have never taken an economics class discussing the formal definition of demand elasticity, I can guess at the answers. Elasticity is a measure of how much the quantity demanded of some product is swayed by changes in price. Economists traditionally place prices on the y-axis and quantity demanded on the x-axis. So if the demand curve is a vertical line, it means that no matter what the price is, customers will keep buying the same amount. This suggests that the elasticity is zero. The horizontal demand line is less meaningful because it shows one price at which customers may demand anything, while if the price is raised ever so slightly, we will fly off the demand curve altogether. Since tiny or even zero changes in price can cause large changes in demand, the elasticity is probably either infinite or undefined.
Draw a diagonal to divide it into two triangles; find the area of each triangle and add the answers.
Standard puzzles have only horizontal and vertical answers. However, there are many novelty puzzles which may contain diagonals, stairsteps, reversals, flower petals and anything else the puzzler can come up with. Games magazine often features such novelty puzzles.