The Romans had no symbol for zero but medieval monks, writing in Latin introduced the symbol N to represent the Latin word Nullae (meaning nothing).
There is no 0 in roman numerals.
Roman numerals don't have a 0 symbol and so it is an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
The representation of 0 in Roman numerals is not applicable as the Romans did not have a symbol for zero in their numerical system.
The difference between roman - numerals and hindu - arabic numerals is that the roman - numerals doesn't have zero 0
there is no zero in roman numerals
There is no Roman numeral for 0 because they didn't feel it was important.
The number "0" does not have a specific representation in Roman numerals. Roman numerals were based on a system of adding and subtracting values of different symbols, so there was no need for a symbol to represent zero.
The roman numerals don't have a way to write 0, negative numbers, or fractions.
Because an 0 symbol is not needed in Roman numerals for positional place value purposes which is essential in Hindu-Arabic numerals
The Romans did not have the concept of zero-- there is no Roman numeral for zero. This lack made it virtually impossible to do arithmetic with Roman numerals and that is why we use Arabic numerals nowadays.
It is: 0 = N
They are: N-CC