$4= $-4= $+4
230 is an integer and there is no sensible way to express it as a mixed number.
I'm pretty sure the answer is negative 11
130 is an integer and it makes little sense to express it as a fractoin but, if you must, you can write it as 130/1.
31 is an integer.
To write 50,000 as an integer, you simply write the number without any decimal or fractional parts. In this case, 50,000 is already an integer because it is a whole number with no decimal or fractional component. Therefore, you can express 50,000 as an integer by writing it as "50,000."
001 is the same as the integer 1 and so you would write it as 1.001 is the same as the integer 1 and so you would write it as 1.001 is the same as the integer 1 and so you would write it as 1.001 is the same as the integer 1 and so you would write it as 1.
It is an integer, not a fraction, but if you must, you could write it as 147000/1.It is an integer, not a fraction, but if you must, you could write it as 147000/1.It is an integer, not a fraction, but if you must, you could write it as 147000/1.It is an integer, not a fraction, but if you must, you could write it as 147000/1.
-14,494
16 is an integer and there is no sensible way to express it as a mixed number.
1.0 is actually equivalent to the integer, 1 but if you do want it in fractional form you could express it as a decimal - exactly as in the question.
The number 5789 is already an integer.
1440 is an integer.