You need to clarify the function AND provide an interval.
X squared is not an inverse function; it is a quadratic function.
(3y2)4*3y2*3y2*3y2*3y2 = 38*y16 = 6561y16
squared 3
5
When you do (7x)2, you square both numbers.So 7 squared=49 and x squared=x2Your answer should be 49x2Let's try another example: 2(3xy)3Now we cube each number in the parentheses. 2(33x3y3)=2(27x3y3)Finally you multiply the 2 and the 27. 54x3y3
That is 1/9x2
X squared is not an inverse function; it is a quadratic function.
Zero. (Regardless of where the parentheses are supposed to go.)
The first thing I would do would be to multiply the decimal by itself, then write theresult inside the parentheses, get rid of the original decimal in there, and throw awaythat little 2 after the parentheses.
(3y2)4*3y2*3y2*3y2*3y2 = 38*y16 = 6561y16
4 squared plus 4 squared divided by 4 plus 4
squared 3
distance equals initial velocity times change in time interval plus half of accerlation plus time interval squared
5
And what is the question?If you want to factor that, first take out the common factor of 2, and put whatever remains in parentheses. Then you can use the rule to factor the difference of two squares, to factor what remains within parentheses.
assuming that there are no parentheses around the (7-1) then it should be 10.7
No. Above x = 2/3, the slope of the x-cubed function is larger than that of the x-squared function. So, for example, a counter-example for the claim is the set of points 0.7 and 0.8.