answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

You need to clarify the function AND provide an interval.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Find the average value of the function on the given interval fx equals 2x to the power of3 open parentheses 1 plus x squared closed to the fourth power?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

3x squared in parentheses to the negative 2nd power?

That is 1/9x2


Why is x squared a inverse function?

X squared is not an inverse function; it is a quadratic function.


What is one-over-infinity squared?

Zero. (Regardless of where the parentheses are supposed to go.)


What do you do with a decimal that is in parentheses and it is squared?

The first thing I would do would be to multiply the decimal by itself, then write theresult inside the parentheses, get rid of the original decimal in there, and throw awaythat little 2 after the parentheses.


What is 3y squared in parentheses to the 4th power 3y squared times 3y squared times 3y squared times 3y squared?

(3y2)4*3y2*3y2*3y2*3y2 = 38*y16 = 6561y16


How do you get 12 using only 4 4's without parentheses?

4 squared plus 4 squared divided by 4 plus 4


Evaluate the function e squared by ln 3?

squared 3


What is Galileo's formula with distance accleraction and time?

distance equals initial velocity times change in time interval plus half of accerlation plus time interval squared


Is y equals 3x squared-2 a function?

5


2 x squared minus 200?

And what is the question?If you want to factor that, first take out the common factor of 2, and put whatever remains in parentheses. Then you can use the rule to factor the difference of two squares, to factor what remains within parentheses.


What is 7 minus 1 times zero point three plus 2 squared?

assuming that there are no parentheses around the (7-1) then it should be 10.7


For any 2 values between 0 and 1 will x squared always have a larger average rate of change than x cubed?

No. Above x = 2/3, the slope of the x-cubed function is larger than that of the x-squared function. So, for example, a counter-example for the claim is the set of points 0.7 and 0.8.