the digits in base ten are: ones, tens, hundreds, thousands, etc.
in base two it's: ones, twos, fours, eights, sixteens, thirty-twos, sixty-fours, one twenty-eights, two fifty-sixes, etc.
in base sixteen, the digits are: ones, sixteens, two fifty-sixes, four thousand ninety-sixes, sixty-five thousand five hundred thirty-sixes, etc.
so every fourth place of base two is also a digit in base sixteen.
sixteen
Please rephrase the question
The answer is no, two thousand four is NOT seven hundred sixteen.
The answer depends on the operator which should be between "sixteen tenths" and "two".
Seventy two and sixteen thousands in standard form is 72.016
sixteen
31DF
A fourth of sixteen and two eights is 65.
271 is 10F in base 16 and 100001111 in binary.
See related links for a summary of chapter sixteen 'Epoch'.
two hundred sixteen = 216
sixteen point two OR sixteen and two tenths
Please rephrase the question
It is only true in the sense that any numeric base, expressed in that base, is represented with the symbol "10". Confusing? Let's clarify that. Hexadecimal numbers use sixteen as the base. But how do you express the value sixteen in hexadecimal? Quite easy, it would be written as "10". The same is true in any other base. For example, in binary (base two), the value two is expressed as "10". In octal (base eight), the value eight is expressed as "10". In decimal (our familiar base ten), the value ten is expressed as "10". No matter what base you work in, the base itself will always be expressed as "10". That however is not the same thing as saying that hexadecimal numbers are based on the number ten. That is incorrect. Hexadecimal numbers use the base sixteen.
thiry three and one third
The answer is no, two thousand four is NOT seven hundred sixteen.
The answer depends on the operator which should be between "sixteen tenths" and "two".