Study guides

Q: A 4 a multiple of 4?

Write your answer...

Submit

Related questions

No, 130 is not a multiple of 4 and 4 is not a multiple of 130.

Four is a factor of 72. 72 is a multiple of 4. 4 is not a multiple of 72.

Any multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2.

Any multiple of 20 is also a multiple of 4.

Is a multiple of 2 also a multiple of 4

4 and any multiple of 4

No. 426 is not a multiple of 4

No - but 4 IS a multiple of 8 !

No, 34 is not a multiple of 4.

No, 51 is not a multiple of 4.

it is 4,4 is a multiple of 4 by 1and4 is a multiple of 2 by 2

No - 4 is a factor of 52, but 52 is a multiple of 4.

No. 2 is a factor of 4. 4 is a multiple of 2.

No. 4 is a factor of 32, and 32 is a multiple of 4.

Yes, 16 is a multiple of 4.

Yes, 296 is a multiple of 4

No, 62 is not a multiple of 4. You can tell this by dividing 62 by 4. Since the answer is not a whole number, 62 is therefore not a multiple of 4.

I assume you mean LCM, least common multiple. The least common multiple of 3 and 4 is 12. 12 is a multiple of 3. 12 is a multiple of 4. No smaller number is a multiple of both 3 and 4.

No. 2 is a factor of 4. 4 is a multiple of 2.

The least common multiple of 4 and 5 is 20. The least common multiple of 15 and 20 is 60. (Thus, the least common multiple of 4, 5, and 15 is 60.) Any multiple of 60 will also be a multiple of 4, 5, and 15.

No, 32 is a multiple of 4. 33 is a multiple of 3

176 is a multiple of 4. 176 is a multiple of 11. That makes it a common multiple of 4 and 11.

No, but vice versa holds true. Case and point: 6 is a multiple of 2, but not a multiple of 4. 8 is a multiple of 4, and is a multiple of 2. Because a factor of 4 is 2, every multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2. But since 4 is not a factor of 2, rather, only half of it, only half of the multiples of 2 will be multiples of 4.

multiple. 4 is afactor of 24

No, 29 isn't a multiple of 4, but 28 is.