"it isn't calculated it is weight in grams or kilograms"
/_\
T
Big Failure to whoever gave this answer. What the answerer was referring to was WEIGHT. NOT MASS.
Mass is the amount of matter inside a body.
Weight is the force that gravitation exerts upon a body, equal to the mass of the body times the local acceleration of gravity: commonly taken, in a region of constant gravitational acceleration, as a measure of mass.
So, let's differentiate mass from weight:
You can take an apple and weigh it. A lot of people should already know is that the mass of this apple CANNOT change without physically changing it (biting a portion of apple, etc.) In other words, (for argument's sake) if you're going to get an apple and bring it to somewhere which is the gravitational pull is in any case different from the Earth like the Moon, in which everyone who went to grade school already know has 1/6 of the gravitational pull compared to Earth's, you will get different WEIGHT but the MASS will not change. It shall remain the same as if you're on Earth.
Computation of Mass:
Relative equation:
Computation of Density: M/V
Computation of Volume: M/D
so,
Computation of Mass: V*D
Although the computation can only be done with the given variables which is related to mass. e.g. Volume, Density, Gravitational force. The formula will change whenever the given variables changes.
Chat with our AI personalities
The first step in calculating mass properties of an object is to assign the location of the
reference axes. The center of gravity and the product of inertia of an object can have any
numerical value or polarity, depending on the choice of axes that are used as a reference
for the calculation. Stating that a CG coordinate is "0.050 inches" means nothing unless
the position of the reference axis is also precisely defined. Any reference axes may be
chosen. For example, the center of gravity of a cylinder may be 4.050 inches from one
end, 0.050 inches from its midpoint, and 3.950 inches from the other end. Furthermore,
each end of the cylinder may not be perpendicular to the central axis, so that a means of
determining the "end" of the cylinder would have to be further defined.
Three mutually perpendicular reference axes are
required to define the location of the center of
gravity of an object. These axes are usually
selected to coincide with edges of the object,
accurately located details, or the geometric center
of the object.
It is not sufficient to state that an axis is the
centerline of the object. You must also specify
which surfaces on the object define this centerline.
Moment of inertia is a rotational quantity and
requires only one axis for its reference. Although
this can theoretically be any axis in the vicinity of
the object, this axis usually is the geometric center,
the rotational center (if the object revolves on
bearings), or a principal axis (axis passing through
the center of gravity which is chosen so the
products of inertia are zero).
Product of inertia requires three mutually perpendicular
reference axes. One of these axes may be a rotational axis
or a geometric centerline.
For maximum accuracy, it is important to use reference
axes that can be located with a high degree of precision. If
the object is an aerospace item, then we recommend that
this object be designed with two reference datum rings per
section, which can be used to define the reference axes.
These rings can be precision attachment points that are
used to interface the object with another section of a
spacecraft or rocket, or they can be rings that were
provided solely for the purpose of alignment and/or measurement
of mass properties. The accuracy of calculation (and the
subsequent accuracy of measurement of an actual piece of hardwure 2 - Datum Rings
Figure 1 Center of gravity (and
product of inertia) are defined
relative to orthogonal axes
----
the accuracy of the means of locating the reference axes. We
have found that the single largest source of error in mass
properties calculations is the uncertainty of the reference. The
dimensional data provided to the mass properties engineer must
be sufficiently accurate to permit mass properties tolerances to be
met.
For example, if you are asked to make precise calculations of
mass properties of a projectile, you should establish the error due
to reference misalignment as the first step in your calculations. If
you are required to calculate CG within an accuracy of 0.001
inch and the reference datum is not round within 0.003 inch, then you
cannot accomplish your task. There is no sense in making a detailed
analysis of the components of an object when the reference error prevents
accurate calculations. Furthermore, it will be impossible to accurately measure such a
part after it is fabricated and verify the accuracy of your calculations. The location and
accuracy of the reference axes must be of the highest precision.
If your task is to calculate the mass properties of a vehicle that is assembled in sections,
then serious thought should be given to the accuracy of alignment of the sections when
they are assembled. Often this can be the biggest single factor in limiting the degree of
balance (if the vehicle was balanced in sections because the total vehicle is too big for the
balancing machine). Alignment error is amplified for long rockets . . . a 0.001 inch lean
introduced by alignment error on a 12 inch diameter can result in a 0.007 inch CG error
on a 15 foot long rocket section. This is discussed in detail in the sections of this paper
that present the math for combining the mass properties of subassemblies.
The accuracy required for various types of calculations is summarized in later sections of
this paper.
Choosing the Location of the Axes
The axes in Figure 3 do not make a good reference because a small error in squareness
of the bottom of the cylinder causes the object to lean away from the vertical axis. The
axes below (Figure 4) make a better choice.
Figure 3
The first step in calculating mass properties is to establish the location of the X,
Y, and Z axes. The accuracy of the calculations (and later on the accuracy of
the measurements to verify the calculations) will depend entirely on the
wisdom used in choosing the axes. Theoretically, these axes can be at any
location relative to the object being considered, provided the axes are mutually
perpendicular. However, in real life, unless the axes are chosen to be at a
location that can be accurately measured and identified, the calculations are
meaningless.
Figure 4
----
Reference axes must be located at physical points on
the object that can be accurately measured. Although
the center line of a ring may exist in midair, it can be
accurately measured and is therefore a good reference
location as can the center of a close tolerance hole
which could be identified as the zero degree reference
to identify the X axis (Fig. 4).
An axis should always pass through a surface that is
rigidly associated with the bulk of the object. In Figure
5 it would be better to locate the origin at the end of the
object rather than the fitting that is loosely dimensioned
relative to the end.