You are thinking of Pythagoras and fermat type jobbies.
32+42=52 (9+16=25)
500 equals 500 - whether with multiplication or division or whatever.
9x9 27x3 81x1
a=3 is the answer to 12a=48
Multiplication and division first, addition and subtraction second. Without brackets, that equation equals 2.
I think multiplication and division alike because if you devide numbers like 36 and 9 you get 4 and if you multiply 9 and 4 it would equal 36
Here's a possibility. In order for a division table to make sense, it would have to be restricted to composite numbers with several factors, both prime and composite. Otherwise, you will run into the dreaded decimal fraction thing. So the result will be that division tables will be a juggling of what we already know as multiplication tables. Without much effort, you can take a multiplication table and convert it into a division table.I cringe just thinking about a 13's division table. 13 divided by 13 equals one. 13 divided by 12 equals--- 13 divided by 10 equals--- OH! 1.3! 13 divided by 9 equals-- etc etc
It's the inverse operation. 3 times 4 equals 12 12 divided by 4 equals 3
The Abelian or commutative property of the multiplication of numbers. It is important that both "multiplication" and "numbers" feature in the answer. Because, it is applicable to multiplication but not, for example, for division. It is applicable for the multiplication on numbers but not matrices.
500, my good sir. -Dr. Bosch
Depending on where you study, it is BIDMAS = Bracket, Index, Division, Multiplication, Addition and Subtraction. or PEMDAS = Parentheses, Exponent, Multiplication, Division, Addition and Subtraction. Actually, these should be BI(DM)(AS) and PE(MD)(AS) since D and M are treated as equals and evaluated left to right, as are A and S.
lets say that you're doing a division problem that looks just like a multiplication problem. lets say its 10 divided by 5 so 2x5 equals 10 so the missing number in the problem is 2 MORE TO COME
18/18=0