well it would be 51
232 116,2 58,2,2 29,2,2,2
factor tree of 232............232............./ \.........116 2........../ \........58 2......../ \......29 2the prime factorization of 232 = 29 x 2 x 2 x 2
The Greastest Common Factor for 232 is 8. the same goes for 320...
no
The factor tree is as follows: 114 57,2 19,3,2
No.
No, because when you divide 232 into 5 the result is a decimal: 46.4
yes
1, 2, 4, 8, 29, 58, 166, 232
991 is already prime. No tree is required.
13 is a prime number. It doesn't have a tree because its only prime factor is itself.
No you cannot. You might want to try the factor tree for 27.