A satisfactory explanation can be given that 2 732 522 842 converted into Roman numerals could possibly be (MM)M(DCCXXXII)M(DXXII)DCCCXXXXII in additional notation.
87
3,000,000
1
You write it as 10, exactly as in the question.
In words ..................... Sixty-nine In decimal ................... 69 In binary ..................... 1000101 In Roman Numerals ..... LXIX In factors ..................... 3, 23
9,000,000
125,000,000
1,000,000
18,100,000
3,300,000
1,100,000
10000