In most respects a square which is a 2-dimensional figure is not like a pyramid which is 3-dimensional. All the sides of the square are the same length whereas none of a pyramid's sides need be.
The only point of similarity is that both are defined by straight lines.
They are polyhedra. They have [at least] one square face.
no because a rectangular as 2 long sies and a sqare dont
They are solid shapes that taper to a point.
they are both classified as a polyhedra.
they r alike by having straight lines and they r dif by a pyramid having 3 side and a cube having 4
both have lateral face shapes that are riangles
they both have quadrilateral bases, they're both polyhedrons, and they both can tessellate (if it's a right prism and a right pyramid)
A pyramid and a cone are alike because they are both are like in the same shape.
how are a cube and a pyramid alike
A cylinder and a square-based pyramid are alike in that both are three-dimensional geometric shapes and can be described using volume and surface area formulas. However, they differ in their bases and shapes: a cylinder has circular bases connected by a curved surface, while a square-based pyramid has a square base and triangular faces that converge to a point at the top. Additionally, the cylinder has uniform cross-sections along its height, whereas the pyramid's cross-section changes from the square base to the apex.
Four sides of a pyramid are triangular-shaped, meaning they have three sides. The fifth side is square-shaped, meaning it's four-sided.
It is just called a square pyramid, but its not square. Its only square on the bottom, so they call it a square pyramid, or you can simply just call it a pyramid because a pyramid is a pyramid.