Best Answer

There are 0.273 lineal metres is a carpet with a standard width of 3.66 metres (from the only imperical measure of 12 feet). The calulation is 0.273 (length) x 3.66 (standard width) = 0.99918 square metres. If you purchased 1 lineal metre of standard carpet you would have 3.66 square metres of carpet. Lineal refers to the length of any item irrespective of it's width and is normally used when the item is produced in standard width's.

🙏

🤨

😮

Study guides

☆☆

Q: How many lineal meters are in a square meter when trying to measure carpet.?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Related questions

Lineal metres = Square metre/Width

Lineal metres = Square metre/Width of the carpet.

This is an invalid conversion: square meters is a measure of area and meters is a measure of length or distance.

29 lineal carpet metres should cover 104 square metres

Invalid conversion: square meters is a measure of area and linear meters is a measure of length or distance.

None. A lineal metre is a measure of distance while a square metre is a measure of area. The two measure different things and it makes no sense to try to convert from one to the other.

14400 lineal feet to square meters

That can be measured in square meters.

Square meters.

This is not a valid conversion. Square meters is a measure of area while 93 cm is a measure of length or distance.

Lineal metres = Square metres/Width of the boards.

Lineal metres = Square metre/Width = Square metres/0.14

I don't understand converting an area to a lineal measurement. Do you mean the length of the side of a square of that area? This would be 201.168 meters.

A carpet that is 5 meters x 5 meters = 25 square meters. If a living room is 30 square meters, the carpet will fit in the living room, but it will not fit it exactly (wall to wall). It will be a bit small.

There can be no conversion. A lineal metre is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space while a square metre is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.

You cannot convert square feet to lineal feet. Lineal feet is a measure of distance. Square feet is a measure of area.

0, because a lineal meter has an area of 0

Square meters cannot be converted into linear meters; square meters are units of are and linear meters are units of length.

This question cannot be answered sensibly. A square metre is a measure of area, with dimensions [L2]. A [lineal] metre is a measure of distance, with dimensions [L]. The two measure different things and basic dimensional analysis teaches that you cannot convert between measures with different dimensions such as these without additional information.

No. You cannot compare two and one dimensional objects! Square meters are a measurement of area (2 dimensions) Lineal meters area one dimensional distance measurement.

None, since there can be no conversion.A linear (or lineal) metre is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space. A square metre is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.

None, since there can be no conversion.A linear (or lineal) metre is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space. A square metre is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.

Answer is Zero. Trick question ! A measure of length ( lineal ) is not a measure of an enclosed area.

The units cannot be exchanged or converted

None, since there can be no conversion.A linear (or lineal) metre is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space. A square metre is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.